Applying quantitative methods to the analysis of coastal risk governance and perception in Catalonia
Visualitza/Obre
Estadístiques de LA Referencia / Recolecta
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/98605
Tipus de documentProjecte Final de Màster Oficial
Data2016-06-30
Condicions d'accésAccés obert
Llevat que s'hi indiqui el contrari, els
continguts d'aquesta obra estan subjectes a la llicència de Creative Commons
:
Reconeixement 3.0 Espanya
Abstract
Risks affecting coasts can be aggravated by climate change. Having adequate response mechanisms requires
an integrated, multi-risk planning system, which should include from prevention to emergency phases of
risk management, together with a wide range of authorities. This research aims at analyzing the social
dimension of coastal risk management at two different levels – analysis of risk governance and of local risk
perception -; introducing quantitative methods as the main tool of analysis.
The approach of the research combines: (a) network analysis to draw relationships between competent
stakeholders and plans, in prevention and in emergency phases, as well as to evaluate the level of integration
of climate change into the current planning system; and (b) statistical analysis of a survey applied to key
stakeholders to analyze the social perception at the local level. The use of unipartite graph models is
introduced as a methodological innovation to visualize and analyze heterogeneous data. Quantitative
methods are complemented by qualitative techniques such as planning analysis, secondary-documents
review and semi-structured interviews to key stakeholders.
Results from network analysis show the complexity of the legal and administrative framework of the
Catalan coastal risk planning, which partly reflects the diversity of causes, origins, temporal and spatial
scales characterizing hazards and risks. On the other hand, a dissimilar management tradition depending on
each type of risk is observed. Flood risk management is coordinated by local and regional administration
institutions with a more multi-risk perspective but unfortunately, they are not responsible for coastal
erosion, a significant component of the global coastal risk in the Catalan littoral, which is managed from
a higher administrative level. In turn, climate change is not present in the emergency phase: it is only
explicitly considered in the Spanish Coastal Law and the Strategic Environmental Assessment. Concerning local perception, outcomes from the survey applied in two study areas (Maresme and Alt
Empordà) reveal the impact of the geographic context to risk perception and to the priorization of quotidian
concerns. The cohabitation for decades with natural hazards in coastal areas (especially in the case of
Maresme) has led the population to acquire knowledge about the origin of these problems quite in line
with scientific research. In contrast, confidence towards responsible stakeholders and management tools
do not present differences according to the area. Scientists arise as the most trustworthy institution, and
planning and coordination are the most prioritized management strategy. It is believed that answers from
this part respond to ideological criteria more than geographical context, though further research would
be required to confirm this assumption. In a few words, we argue that an overall planning system that
guarantees integration amongst administrative levels and sectorial policies is required to increase overall
coastal safety. In addition, public perception is a core issue in risk decisions, thus its inclusion into the
design of risk planning is essential to achieve an integrated strategic coastal risk management.
MatèriesShore protection, Coastal engineering, Litoral -- Protecció -- Catalunya, Enginyeria de costes
TitulacióMÀSTER UNIVERSITARI EN CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA DE LA SOSTENIBILITAT (Pla 2013)
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
TFM_AnnaJuliàVerdaguer.pdf | 7,864Mb | Visualitza/Obre |