Mostra el registre d'ítem simple
Comparison of two PV array models for the simulation of PV systems using five different algorithms for the parameters identification
dc.contributor.author | Kichou, Sofiane |
dc.contributor.author | Silvestre Bergés, Santiago |
dc.contributor.author | Guglielminotti, Letizia |
dc.contributor.author | Mora-López, Llanos |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz-Cerón, Emilio |
dc.contributor.other | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-27T14:04:55Z |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-01T01:31:17Z |
dc.date.issued | 2016-07-15 |
dc.identifier.citation | Kichou, S., Silvestre, S., Guglielminotti , L., Mora-López, L., Muñoz-Cerón, E. Comparison of two PV array models for the simulation of PV systems using five different algorithms for the parameters identification. "Renewable energy", 15 Juliol 2016, vol. 99, p. 270-279. |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-1481 |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2117/89279 |
dc.description.abstract | Simulation is of primal importance in the prediction of the produced power and automatic fault detection in PV grid-connected systems (PVGCS). The accuracy of simulation results depends on the models used for main components of the PV system, especially for the PV module. The present paper compares two PV array models, the five-parameter model (5PM) and the Sandia Array Performance Model (SAPM). Five different algorithms are used for estimating the unknown parameters of both PV models in order to see how they affect the accuracy of simulations in reproducing the outdoor behavior of three PVGCS. The arrays of the PVGCS are of three different PV module technologies: Crystalline silicon (c-Si), amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) and micromorph silicon (a-Si:H/µc-Si:H). The accuracy of PV module models based on the five algorithms is evaluated by means of the Route Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Normalized Mean Absolute Error (NMAE), calculated for different weather conditions (clear sky, semi-cloudy and cloudy days). For both models considered in this study, the best accuracy is obtained from simulations using the estimated values of unknown parameters delivered by the ABC algorithm. Where, the maximum error values of RMSE and NMAE stay below 6.61% and 2.66% respectively. |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies::Recursos energètics renovables |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies::Energia solar fotovoltaica |
dc.subject.lcsh | Renewable energy sources |
dc.subject.lcsh | Photovoltaic power generation |
dc.subject.other | PV modeling |
dc.subject.other | Simulation |
dc.subject.other | Parameter extraction |
dc.subject.other | Metaheuristic algorithms |
dc.title | Comparison of two PV array models for the simulation of PV systems using five different algorithms for the parameters identification |
dc.type | Article |
dc.subject.lemac | Energies renovables |
dc.subject.lemac | Energia solar fotovoltaica |
dc.contributor.group | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. MNT - Grup de Recerca en Micro i Nanotecnologies |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.002 |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116305985 |
dc.rights.access | Open Access |
local.identifier.drac | 18770808 |
dc.description.version | Postprint (author's final draft) |
local.citation.author | Kichou, S.; Silvestre, S.; Guglielminotti, L.; Mora-López, L.; Muñoz-Cerón, E. |
local.citation.publicationName | Renewable energy |
local.citation.volume | 99 |
local.citation.startingPage | 270 |
local.citation.endingPage | 279 |
Fitxers d'aquest items
Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents
-
Articles de revista [346]
-
Articles de revista [1.725]