Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorKichou, Sofiane
dc.contributor.authorSilvestre Bergés, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorGuglielminotti, Letizia
dc.contributor.authorMora-López, Llanos
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Cerón, Emilio
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-27T14:04:55Z
dc.date.available2018-12-01T01:31:17Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-15
dc.identifier.citationKichou, S., Silvestre, S., Guglielminotti , L., Mora-López, L., Muñoz-Cerón, E. Comparison of two PV array models for the simulation of PV systems using five different algorithms for the parameters identification. "Renewable energy", 15 Juliol 2016, vol. 99, p. 270-279.
dc.identifier.issn0960-1481
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/89279
dc.description.abstractSimulation is of primal importance in the prediction of the produced power and automatic fault detection in PV grid-connected systems (PVGCS). The accuracy of simulation results depends on the models used for main components of the PV system, especially for the PV module. The present paper compares two PV array models, the five-parameter model (5PM) and the Sandia Array Performance Model (SAPM). Five different algorithms are used for estimating the unknown parameters of both PV models in order to see how they affect the accuracy of simulations in reproducing the outdoor behavior of three PVGCS. The arrays of the PVGCS are of three different PV module technologies: Crystalline silicon (c-Si), amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) and micromorph silicon (a-Si:H/µc-Si:H). The accuracy of PV module models based on the five algorithms is evaluated by means of the Route Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Normalized Mean Absolute Error (NMAE), calculated for different weather conditions (clear sky, semi-cloudy and cloudy days). For both models considered in this study, the best accuracy is obtained from simulations using the estimated values of unknown parameters delivered by the ABC algorithm. Where, the maximum error values of RMSE and NMAE stay below 6.61% and 2.66% respectively.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies::Recursos energètics renovables
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies::Energia solar fotovoltaica
dc.subject.lcshRenewable energy sources
dc.subject.lcshPhotovoltaic power generation
dc.subject.otherPV modeling
dc.subject.otherSimulation
dc.subject.otherParameter extraction
dc.subject.otherMetaheuristic algorithms
dc.titleComparison of two PV array models for the simulation of PV systems using five different algorithms for the parameters identification
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacEnergies renovables
dc.subject.lemacEnergia solar fotovoltaica
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. MNT - Grup de Recerca en Micro i Nanotecnologies
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.002
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116305985
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac18770808
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
local.citation.authorKichou, S.; Silvestre, S.; Guglielminotti, L.; Mora-López, L.; Muñoz-Cerón, E.
local.citation.publicationNameRenewable energy
local.citation.volume99
local.citation.startingPage270
local.citation.endingPage279


Fitxers d'aquest items

Thumbnail

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple