Argument schemes and critical questions for deciding upon the viability of a human organ for transplantation

Abstract

In this document we present an extensive list of argument schemes and critical questions intended to enable agents to argue over the viability of a given human organ. These schemes can be regarded as a domain specific argumentation dialog game, in which the Critical

Questions of a given scheme determine the possible dialog moves. In order to represent the wide list of Argument Schemes and

Critical Questions in a comprehensible manner we propose in this report a novel formalization of the argument schemes interaction.