Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGámez García, Diana C.
dc.contributor.authorGómez Soberón, José Manuel Vicente
dc.contributor.authorCorral Higuera, Ramón
dc.contributor.authorAlmaral Sánchez, Jorge Luis
dc.contributor.authorGómez Soberón, M. Consolación
dc.contributor.authorGómez Soberón, Luís Alberto
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Construccions Arquitectòniques II
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-25T11:01:34Z
dc.date.available2015-09-25T11:01:34Z
dc.date.created2015-06-01
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.identifier.citationGámez, D., Gómez-Soberón, J.M., Corral, R., Almaral-Sánchez, J.L., Gómez, M. C., Gómez, L. LCA as comparative tool for concrete columns and glulam columns. "Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering", 01 Juny 2015, núm. 2, p. 21-30.
dc.identifier.issn2335–2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/77094
dc.description.abstractNowadays, in the construction sector, some methods are being investigated to detect and minimize their environmental impact. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that allows the evaluation of the environmental burden of a product or process, with a scientific recognition increment; and therefore the aim of this work is to verify the feasibility of the use of LCA in the construction sector. For this purpose, the environmental impacts of the use of conventional reinforced concrete (RC) columns, and Glulam (G) as an alternative material, were compared. The scope of the LCA included the extraction and manufacture of materials and construction of the columns; the software tools used were LCA Manager 1.3 and database Ecoinvent 2.0. The study showed that the most critical stage is the production of materials. RC reports 3.5 times more damage to ecosystem quality, requires a 32% more extraction of natural resources, and produces effects on human health 53% higher than G; while G generates 108 times more damage to land occupation; however, considering environmental measures, this effect can be mitigated, since it is a material 100% renewable. Finally, it was verified that LCA is a feasible option to use in the construction field and, it provides a wide range of results.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Edificació::Construcció sostenible
dc.subject.lcshSustainable construction
dc.subject.lcshConcrete--Testing
dc.subject.otherGlulam
dc.subject.otherLCA
dc.subject.otherReinforced-Concrete
dc.subject.otherSustainable-Construction
dc.titleLCA as comparative tool for concrete columns and glulam columns
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacConstrucció sostenible
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GICITED - Grup Interdiciplinari de Ciència i Tecnologia en l'Edificació
dc.identifier.doi10.5755/j01.sace.11.2.10291
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sace.ktu.lt/index.php/DAS/article/view/10291/6944
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac16836671
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
local.citation.authorGámez, D.; Gómez-Soberón, J.M.; Corral, R.; Almaral-Sánchez, J.L.; Gómez, M. C.; Gómez, L.
local.citation.publicationNameJournal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering
local.citation.volume11
local.citation.number2
local.citation.startingPage21
local.citation.endingPage30


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license : Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain