An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for dam behaviour modelling
View/Open
Cita com:
hdl:2117/76195
Document typeArticle
Defense date2015-09
Rights accessOpen Access
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work
is licensed under a Creative Commons license
:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Abstract
Predictive models are essential in dam safety assessment. Both deterministic and statistical models applied in the day-to-day practice have demonstrated to be useful, although they show relevant limitations at the same time. On another note, powerful learning algorithms have been developed in the field of machine learning (ML), which have been applied to solve practical problems. The work aims at testing the prediction capability of some state-of-the-art algorithms to model dam behaviour, in terms of displacements and leakage. Models based on random forests (RF), boosted regression trees (BRT), neural networks (NN), support vector machines (SVM) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) are fitted to predict 14 target variables. Prediction accuracy is compared with the conventional statistical model, which shows poorer performance on average. BRT models stand out as the most accurate overall, followed by NN and RF. It was also verified that the model fit can be improved by removing the records of the first years of dam functioning from the training set.
CitationSalazar, F., Toledo, M. A., Oñate, E., Morán, R. An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for dam behaviour modelling. "Structural safety", Setembre 2015, p. 9-17.
ISSN0167-4730
Publisher versionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.05.001
Files | Description | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
16669302.pdf | 1,841Mb | View/Open |