A systematic review on multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on weights: analysis and classification scheme
10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.004
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/385395
Tipus de documentArticle
Data publicació2023-08
EditorElsevier
Condicions d'accésAccés obert
Llevat que s'hi indiqui el contrari, els
continguts d'aquesta obra estan subjectes a la llicència de Creative Commons
:
Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional
Abstract
Interest in group decision-making (GDM) has been increasing prominently over the last decade. Access to global databases, sophisticated sensors which can obtain multiple inputs or complex problems requiring opinions from several experts have driven interest in data aggregation. Consequently, the field has been widely studied from several viewpoints and multiple approaches have been proposed. Nevertheless, there is a lack of general framework. Moreover, this problem is exacerbated in the case of experts’ weighting methods, one of the most widely-used techniques to deal with multiple source aggregation. This lack of general classification scheme, or a guide to assist expert knowledge, leads to ambiguity or misreading for readers, who may be overwhelmed by the large amount of unclassified information currently available. To invert this situation, a general GDM framework is presented which divides and classifies all data aggregation techniques, focusing on and expanding the classification of experts’ weighting methods in terms of analysis type by carrying out an in-depth literature review. Results are not only classified but analysed and discussed regarding multiple characteristics, such as MCDMs in which they are applied, type of data used, ideal solutions considered or when they are applied. Furthermore, general requirements supplement this analysis such as initial influence, or component division considerations. As a result, this paper provides not only a general classification scheme and a detailed analysis of experts’ weighting methods but also a road map for researchers working on GDM topics or a guide for experts who use these methods. Furthermore, six significant contributions for future research pathways are provided in the conclusions.
CitacióBoix-Cots, D.; Pardo-Bosch, F.; Pujadas, P. A systematic review on multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on weights: analysis and classification scheme. "Information fusion", Agost 2023, vol. 96, p. 16-36.
ISSN1566-2535
Versió de l'editorhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253523000842
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
A systematic re ... classification scheme.pdf | Artículo principal: A systematic review on multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on weights: Analysis and classification scheme | 2,864Mb | Visualitza/Obre |