Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBajet Mena, Pau Genis
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T08:03:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T08:03:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-28
dc.identifier.citationBajet, Pau. PhD: Grasping Knowledge Through Design Speculation. A: Garcia Escudero, Daniel; Bardí Milà, Berta, eds. “IX Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA'21), Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Valladolid, 11 y 12 de Noviembre de 2021: libro de actas”. Barcelona: UPC IDP; GILDA, 2021. ISBN: 978-84-9880-969-5, p. 424-437
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-9880-969-5
dc.identifier.issn2462-571X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/356092
dc.description.abstractThis communication aims to bring to the foreground something academic discussion can’t ignore: rather than emulating other disciplines, why can’t architects rely on a methodological approach to doctoral practice that makes its own praxis central to its research? Why can’t the enduring making of design speculation be embedded as pivotal to critical and prospective qualitative enquiry? My questions allude to the necessity of transdisciplinary approaches to architectural doctorates—concerned with relevance above verification, subtly tacit as well as explicit forms of knowledge. I advocate a methodological path that attempts to build a bridge between architectural theory and practice—disconnected, I argue, by conventional modes in academia. This communication delineates context and precedence in this field of research, before using the close experience of a PhD case study, to present research through designing as a projective journey valuable in grasping ambiguous yet fundamental aspects of architectural knowledge.
dc.description.abstractEsta comunicación quiere traer al centro del debate académico algo que no podemos dejar pasar: ¿en vez de emular otras disciplinas, por qué los arquitectos no permitimos que la praxis devenga una herramienta central en la investigación doctoral? ¿Por qué algo tan familiar como la especulación proyectual no puede formar parte de una crítica y prospectiva indagación cualitativa? Estas preguntas aluden a la necesidad de aproximaciones transdisciplinares a los doctorados arquitectónicos. Prácticas concernidas por formas entrelazadas de conocimiento tácito y explícito, que anteponen lo relevante a lo verificable; un sendero metodológico que trata de construir puentes entre teoría y práctica. Esta comunicación empieza delineando desarrollos previos en este campo de investigación y sigue explicando la experiencia cercana de un doctorado en curso, con el objetivo de sugerir la investigación a través de la especulación proyectual como una herramienta valiosa para acceder a ambiguos aun vitales sustratos de conocimiento arquitectónico.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was started thanks to a two-years scholarship by La Caixa Fellowship.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGrup per a la Innovació i la Logística Docent en l'Arquitectura (GILDA)
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Iniciativa Digital Politècnica
dc.relation.ispartofJornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (9as: 2021: Valladolid)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Arquitectura
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture -- Study and teaching (Higher)
dc.subject.lcshArchitectural design
dc.subject.lcshActive learning
dc.subject.otherDoctorado proyectual
dc.subject.otherConocimiento proyectual
dc.subject.otherProyecto como investigación
dc.subject.otherAprendizaje especulativo
dc.subject.otherInvestigación prospectiva
dc.subject.otherPhD by design
dc.subject.otherKnowledge through design
dc.subject.otherDesign as research
dc.subject.otherSpeculative learning
dc.subject.otherProspective research
dc.titlePhD: Grasping Knowledge Through Design Speculation
dc.title.alternativePhD: Acceder al conocimiento a través de la especulación proyectual
dc.typeConference report
dc.subject.lemacArquitectura -- Ensenyament universitari
dc.subject.lemacDisseny arquitectònic
dc.subject.lemacAprenentatge actiu
dc.identifier.doi10.5821/jida.2021.10564
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.date.updated2021-11-11T08:03:02Z
dc.relation.referencesALONSO, P. (1989). ‘Infrastructures’ in Quaderns d’Arquitectura i Urbanisme, No.181-182, pp18-29.
dc.relation.referencesARCHER, B. (1979). ‘Design as a Discipline’ in Design Studies Vol. 1, No 1, pp17-20.
dc.relation.referencesARCHER, B. (1995). ‘Nature of Research’ in Co-design, interdisciplinary journal of design. pp6-13.
dc.relation.referencesBARAC, M. (2011). ‘Place resists: grounding African urban order in an age of global change’ in Social Dynamics, 37: 1, pp24-42.
dc.relation.referencesBEIGEL, F. and CHRISTOU, P. (1996). ‘Brikettfabrik Witznitz: specific indeterminacy – designing for Uncertainty’ in Design: arq: Vol 2. pp18-38.
dc.relation.referencesBEIGEL, F. and CHRISTOU, P. (1999). ‘Time architecture: Stadtlandschaft Lichterfelde Slid, Berlin’ in Design: arq: Vol 3, pp202-219.
dc.relation.referencesBEIGEL, F. and CHRISTOU, P. (2014). Translations. Christoph Merian Verlag and Swiss Architecture Museum, Basel.
dc.relation.referencesBEIGEL, F. and CHRISTOU, P. Architecture Research Unit, ARU <aru.londonmet.ac.uk> [Accessed 18 August 2021].
dc.relation.referencesBENJAMIN, W. (1940). ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, translated by Zohn, H.; in Illuminations, Fonta, London, 1973.
dc.relation.referencesBIGGS, M. (2002). ‘The role of the artefact in art and design research’. International journal of design sciences and technology 10 (2): 19-24.
dc.relation.referencesBLYTHE, R. and VAN SCHAIK, L. (2013). ‘What if Design Practice Matters?’, in Fraser, M. (Ed.) Design Research in Architecture. Routledge. New York. 2013, pp53-70.
dc.relation.referencesCASTELLANO-PULIDO, F. (2015). ‘Infrastructure and Memory. From Geddes' Agricultural Terraces to Beigel's Overlapping Landscapes’. Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura. Universidad de Sevilla.
dc.relation.referencesCROSS, N. (1982). ‘Designerly ways of knowing’. Design Studies Vol 3, No 4, pp221-227.
dc.relation.referencesDE WALSCHE, J. and KOMOSSA, S. (2013). ‘Architectural research vis-à-vis Research-by-design’ in De Walsche, J. and Komossa, S. (Eds.) 2016. Prototypes and Paradigms. (DR_SoM: Design Research, Series on Method; Vol. 1). TU Delft Open, pp9-22.
dc.relation.referencesDUNIN-WOYSETH, H. and NILSSON, F. (2012). ‘On the emergence of research by design and practice- based research approaches in architectural and urban design’ in Hensel, M. (Ed.) ‘Design Innovation for the Built Environment: Research by Design and the Renovation of Practice’. Routledge. London, pp37-51.
dc.relation.referencesDUNLEAVY, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD. Palgrave McMillan.
dc.relation.referencesDURLING, D. (2000). ‘Design in the UK: some reflections on the emerging PhD’ in Doctoral Education in Design: Foundations for the Future, Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Staffordshire University, pp317-328.
dc.relation.referencesDURLING, D. (2002). ‘Discourses on research and the PhD in Design’. Quality Assurance in Education, Volume 10, Number 2, pp79-85.
dc.relation.referencesECO, U. (1977). How to Write a Thesis. MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesFINDELI, A. (1998). ‘A Quest for Credibility: Doctoral Education and Research in Design at the University of Montreal’ in Doctoral Education in Design. Proceedings of the Ohio Conference.
dc.relation.referencesFRAYLING, C. (1993). ‘Research in art and design’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol.1 no.1, pp1- 5.
dc.relation.referencesFRAYLING, C. et al. (1997). Practice-based doctorates in the creative and performing arts and design. Lichfield: UK Council for Graduate Education.
dc.relation.referencesFRASER, M. (2013). ‘Introduction’ in Fraser, M. (Ed.) Design Research in Architecture. Routledge. New York.
dc.relation.referencesFRIEDMAN, K. (2008). ‘Research Into, By and For Design’ in Journal of Visual Arts Practice, Volume 7 No 2, pp153-160.
dc.relation.referencesGARCÍA-GARCÍA, M. (2018). ‘Diseñando la resiliencia’ in Espegel, C., Cánovas, A., Blanco, A. UNDO! Desurbanizar. Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos, ETSAM-UPM.
dc.relation.referencesGARCÍA-GERMÁN, J. (2017). ‘Thermodynamic Interactions’ in García-Germán, J. (ed.) Thermodynamic Interactions. An Architectural Exploration into Physiological, Material, Territorial Atmospheres. Actar Publishers. New York.
dc.relation.referencesGEDDES, P. (1915). Cities in evolution. Williams & Norgate. London.
dc.relation.referencesGROSZ, E. (1998). ‘The Future of Space: Toward an Architecture of Invention’ in Davidson, C. (ed.) Anyhow. Cambridge: MIT Press.; essay reprinted in GROSZ, E. 2001. Architecture from the Outside. Essays on Virtual and Real Space. The MIT Press, pp109-130.
dc.relation.referencesHABRAKEN, N.J. (1961). Dragers en de Mensen (the Supports and the People). Scheltema & Holkema (ed.). English edition: 2011. Supports. The Urban International Press, UK.
dc.relation.referencesHABRAKEN, N.J. (1998). The Structure of the ordinary. Form and control in the built environment. The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesHERTZBERGER, H. (2005). ‘Time-based buildings’ in Leupen, B. et al. (ed.) Time Based Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesHILL, J. (2013). ‘Design Research: The First 500 Years’ in Fraser, M. (Ed.) Design Research in Architecture. Routledge. New York.
dc.relation.referencesHUNCH 10: MEDIATORS (ed.). (2006). ‘PhD Program’. Berlage Insititute, International Postgraduate Laboratory of Architecture, Rotterdam, p135.
dc.relation.referencesJONAS, W. (2012). ‘Exploring the Swampy Ground’ in Grand, S. and Jonas, W. (eds.) Mapping design research. Birkhäuser Basel, pp11-42.
dc.relation.referencesKIKUTAKE, K.; KAWAZOE, N.; OTAKA, M.; MAKI, F. and KUROKAWA, N. (1960). Metabolism: the Proposals for New Urbanism.
dc.relation.referencesLAWSON, B. (2002). ‘The subject that won't go away. But perhaps we are ahead of the game. Design as research.’ Architectural Research Quarterly 6(2), pp109-114.
dc.relation.referencesLEFEBVRE, H. (1967). ‘Perspective or Prospective’, in Kofman, E. and Lebas, E. (Eds.) (1996) ‘Writings on Cities.’ Originally published in Le Droit à la ville, 1967.
dc.relation.referencesMÄKELÄ, M. (2007). ‘Knowledge through making: The role of the artefact in practice-based research.’ Nordic Design Research Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
dc.relation.referencesMALDONADO, L. (2011). ‘Presentación Textos Académicos ETSAM-UPC’ in López-Peláez, J. M. (ed). Diez: 10 tesis en curso. Colección de Textos Académicos ETSAB-UPM. Maire libros. Madrid.
dc.relation.referencesMORTON, T. (2018). Being Ecological. Pelican Books, Penguin Random House UK.
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris.
dc.relation.referencesOSBORNE, P. (1994). ‘The Politics of Time’ in Radical Philosophy, 68, pp3-9.
dc.relation.referencesOUWERKERK, M. and ROSEMANN, J. (2001). Research by Design: International Conference. Faculty of Architecture Delft University of Technology in co-operation with the EAAE/AEEA. International Conference November 2000.
dc.relation.referencesPEDGLEY, O. (1999). Industrial designer’s attention to materials and manufacturing processes: analyses at macroscopic and microscopic levels. PhD thesis. Loughborough University.
dc.relation.referencesPEDGLEY, O. (2007). ‘Capturing and analyzing own design activity’. Design Studies 28, pp463-480.
dc.relation.referencesPEDGLEY, O. and WORMALD, P. (2007). ‘Integration of Design Projects within a PhD’ in Design Issues, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp70-85. The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesPÉREZ-GÓMEZ, A. (1983). Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science. The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesPOLANYI, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesPRITCHARD, L. (2020). Bastide City Territory: Landscape Infrastructure Design, Monpazier, France. PhD Book. London Metropolitan University.
dc.relation.referencesRUST, C.; MOTTRAM, J.; and TILL, J. (2007). Review of practice-led research in art, design and architecture. UK, Arts and Humanities Research Council.
dc.relation.referencesSCHÖN, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesSENNETT, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSIMON, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press. Revised edition 1996.
dc.relation.referencesSIZA, A.(1986). ‘On the difficulty of designing a piece of furniture’ in Quaderns d’Arquitectura i Urbanisme. No. 169-170, p79.
dc.relation.referencesSOLAGUREN-BEASCOA, F. (2017). ‘Epílogo. Qué es investigar en arquitectura’ in Investigar en arquitectura. General de Ediciones de Arquitectura, Valencia, España.
dc.relation.referencesSTAVRIDES, S. (2016). Common Space: The City as Commons. Zed Books, London.
dc.relation.referencesTILL, J. (2008). ‘Three Myths and One Model’, Building Material Vol.17, pp 4-10. Dublin.
dc.relation.referencesVAN DER BERGHE, J. (2012). Theatre of Operations, or: Construction Site as Architectural Design. PhD Book. RMIT University, Melbourne.
dc.relation.referencesVAN DER VOORDT, D.J.M. (1996). Doctorates in Design and Architecture Conference Book. Faculty of Architecture of the Delft University of Technology.
dc.relation.referencesVERBEKE, J. 2013. ‘This is Research by Design’, in Fraser, M. (Ed.) Design Research in Architecture. Routledge. New York, pp137-160.
dc.relation.referencesVIDAL, T. and POL, E. (2005). ‘La apropiación del espacio: una propuesta teórica para comprender la vinculación entre las personas y los lugares’. Anuario de psicología, The UB Journal of psychology, 36(3), pp281-298.
dc.relation.referencesVITRUVIUS POLLIO, M. ca. 30-15 BC. De Architectura. English translation by Hicky, M.; published as The Ten Books on Architecture by Harvard University Press in 1914.
dc.relation.referencesWALKER, B. and SALT, D. (2006). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Washington DC: Island press.
local.citation.contributorJornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA)
local.citation.pubplaceBarcelona
local.citation.publicationNameIX Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA'21), Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Valladolid, 11 y 12 de Noviembre de 2021: libro de actas
local.citation.startingPage424
local.citation.endingPage437
local.ordre35
local.personalitzacitaciotrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record