Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTang, Weiyi
dc.contributor.authorLlort, Joan
dc.contributor.authorWeis, Jakob
dc.contributor.authorPerron, Morgane M. G.
dc.contributor.authorBasart, Sara
dc.contributor.otherBarcelona Supercomputing Center
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T15:11:54Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T01:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTang, W. [et al.]. Widespread phytoplankton blooms triggered by 2019–2020 Australian wildfires. "Nature", 2021, vol. 597, núm. 7876, p. 370-375.
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/351768
dc.description.abstractDroughts and climate-change-driven warming are leading to more frequent and intense wildfires1,2,3, arguably contributing to the severe 2019–2020 Australian wildfires4. The environmental and ecological impacts of the fires include loss of habitats and the emission of substantial amounts of atmospheric aerosols5,6,7. Aerosol emissions from wildfires can lead to the atmospheric transport of macronutrients and bio-essential trace metals such as nitrogen and iron, respectively8,9,10. It has been suggested that the oceanic deposition of wildfire aerosols can relieve nutrient limitations and, consequently, enhance marine productivity11,12, but direct observations are lacking. Here we use satellite and autonomous biogeochemical Argo float data to evaluate the effect of 2019–2020 Australian wildfire aerosol deposition on phytoplankton productivity. We find anomalously widespread phytoplankton blooms from December 2019 to March 2020 in the Southern Ocean downwind of Australia. Aerosol samples originating from the Australian wildfires contained a high iron content and atmospheric trajectories show that these aerosols were likely to be transported to the bloom regions, suggesting that the blooms resulted from the fertilization of the iron-limited waters of the Southern Ocean. Climate models project more frequent and severe wildfires in many regions1,2,3. A greater appreciation of the links between wildfires, pyrogenic aerosols13, nutrient cycling and marine photosynthesis could improve our understanding of the contemporary and glacial–interglacial cycling of atmospheric CO2 and the global climate system.
dc.description.sponsorshipAnalyses of satellite aerosol observations used in this study were produced with the Giovanni online data system, developed and maintained by the NASA GES DISC. We thank SeaWiFS and MODIS mission scientists and associated NASA personnel for the production of the data used in this research effort. The BGC-Argo data were collected and made freely available by the International Argo Program and the national programs that contribute to it (http://www.argo.ucsd.edu, http://argo.jcommops.org). The Argo Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing System (https://doi.org/10.17882/42182). W.T. is supported by the Harry H. Hess Postdoctoral Fellowship from Princeton University. N.C. is supported by the “Laboratoire d’Excellence” LabexMER (ANR‐10‐LABX‐19) and co-funded by a grant from the French government under the program “Investissements d’Avenir”. S.B. acknowledges the AXA Research Fund for the support of the long-term research line on Sand and Dust Storms at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) and CAMS Global Validation (CAMS-84). P.G.S., J.L., M.M.G.P. and A.R.B. are supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects scheme (DP190103504). P.G.S. and J.W. are supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CLEX: CE170100023). J.L. is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 754433. A.R.B. is supported by the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship scheme (FT130100037). R.M. is supported by the CSIRO Decadal Climate Forecasting Project. We thank M. Strzelec, M. East, T. Holmes, M. Corkill, S. Meyerink and the Wellington Park Management Trust for help with installation and sampling the Tasmanian aerosol time-series station; A. Townsend for iron aerosol analyses by ICPMS at the University of Tasmania; and A. Benedetti and S. Remy for providing insights on the validation of aerosol reanalysis.
dc.format.extent6 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Degradació ambiental::Canvi climàtic
dc.subject.lcshClimatic changes
dc.subject.lcshDroughts
dc.subject.lcshWildfires--Australia.
dc.subject.lcshAtmospheric aerosols
dc.subject.lcshPhytoplankton algal blooms
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric chemistry
dc.subject.otherCarbon cycle
dc.subject.otherFire ecology
dc.subject.otherMarine chemistry
dc.titleWidespread phytoplankton blooms triggered by 2019–2020 Australian wildfires
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacCanvis climàtics
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41586-021-03805-8
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03805-8
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/754433/EU/SupercompuTing And Related applicationS Fellows Program/STARS
local.citation.publicationNameNature
local.citation.volume597
local.citation.number7876
local.citation.startingPage370
local.citation.endingPage375
dc.description.authorship"Article signat per 15 autors/es: Weiyi Tang, Joan Llort, Jakob Weis, Morgane M. G. Perron, Sara Basart, Zuchuan Li, Shubha Sathyendranath, Thomas Jackson, Estrella Sanz Rodriguez, Bernadette C. Proemse, Andrew R. Bowie, Christina Schallenberg, Peter G. Strutton, Richard Matear & Nicolas Cassar"


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder