Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBové Tous, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorFerrer Ballester, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorLópez Almansa, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRoure Fernández, Francisco
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Anàlisi Estructural
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Resistència de Materials i Estructures a l'Enginyeria
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Tecnologia de l'Arquitectura
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-13T11:09:44Z
dc.date.available2021-09-13T11:09:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.citationBove, O. [et al.]. Comparison Between Two Types of Seismic Tests of Racking Systems. "ce/papers", Setembre 2021, vol. 4, núm. 2-4, p. 1992-1998.
dc.identifier.issn2509-7075
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/351154
dc.description.abstractThis paper is the result of both experimental and numeric analyses on pallet rack components. Two cyclic testing protocols for beam-end connectors of adjustable racking systems are compared; such experiments are named as “code type” and “Castiglioni”. Both protocols share the same test mock-up: an assembly of a doubly-pinned upright segment with a cantilever beam specimen. These tests consist in an up-to-failure increasing push-pull process at the free beam end. In the “code type” test, the imposed displacement loops are centered around zero; conversely, in the “Castiglioni” tests, both upward and downward displacement segment runs are centered around a vertical static equilibrium situation (to take the gravitational load into account). The “code type” test is expected to result in a higher number of cycles than the “Castiglioni” one because of the two following features of the latter: (i) the gravitational load is always present, thus resulting in a higher demanding test, and (ii) the failure point is precisely predefined and usually produced before the total breakdown. This paper describes and compares experiments using both protocols. Additionally, these tests are numerically simulated.
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria dels materials::Assaig de materials
dc.subject.lcshGirders
dc.subject.otherAdjustable pallet racking
dc.subject.otherTesting
dc.subject.otherBeam-upright connection
dc.subject.otherCyclic Behavior
dc.subject.otherSeismic Performance
dc.titleComparison Between Two Types of Seismic Tests of Racking Systems
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacBigues
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. REMM - Recerca en Estructures i Mecànica de Materials
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GMNE - Grup de Mètodes Numèrics en Enginyeria
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cepa.1513
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.1513
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac32005165
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
local.citation.authorBove, O.; Ferrer, M.; Lopez Almansa, F.; Roure, F.
local.citation.publicationNamece/papers
local.citation.volume4
local.citation.number2-4
local.citation.startingPage1992
local.citation.endingPage1998


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license : Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain