Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGinjaume Egido, Mercè
dc.contributor.authorCarinou, Eleftheria
dc.contributor.authorBrodecki, M.
dc.contributor.authorClairand, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorPrincipi, Sara
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Institut de Tècniques Energètiques
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T08:33:06Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T08:33:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationGinjaume, M. [et al.]. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology. "Journal of radiological protection", Març 2019, vol. 39, núm. 1, p. 97-111.
dc.identifier.issn0952-4746
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/339463
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: “Ginjaume, M. [et al.]. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology. "Journal of radiological protection, Març 2019, vol. 39, núm. 1, p. 97-111.” which has been published in final form at [doi: 10.1002/pc.23230]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/open_access/
dc.description.abstractIn fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures, workers use protective garments and often two personal dosemeters, the readings of which are used for the estimation of the effective dose; whereas the dosemeter above the protection can be used for the estimation of the equivalent dose of the lens of the eye. When a protective apron is worn the scattered field that reaches the dosemeter is different from the case where no protection is used; this study analyses the changes in the response of seven passive and eight active personal dosemeters (APDs) when they are placed above a lead or lead equivalent garment for S-Cs and x-ray diagnostic qualities. Monte Carlo simulations are used to support the experimental results. It is found that for passive dosemeters, the influence on the dosemeter's response to the lead or lead equivalent was within the range 15%–38% for the x-ray qualities. This effect is smaller, of the order of 10%, when lead-free garments are used, and much smaller, within 1%–10%, for most of the APDs used in the study. From these results it is concluded that when comparing passive and active dosemeter measurements worn above the protection, a difference of 20%–40% is expected. The effect is small when deriving the effective dose from double dosimetry algorithms, but it can be of major importance when eye lens monitoring is based on the use of the dosemeter worn above the protection.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Física
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Física::Electromagnetisme
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la salut::Medicina
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la salut::Medicina::Diagnòstic per la imatge
dc.subject.lcshRadiation dosimetry
dc.subject.lcshMonte Carlo method
dc.subject.lcshEye -- Protection
dc.subject.otherPassive personal dosemeter
dc.subject.otherActive personal dosemeter
dc.subject.otherInterventional radiology
dc.subject.otherEye lens equivalent dose
dc.subject.otherDouble dosimetry
dc.titleEffect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacRadiació -- Dosimetria
dc.subject.lemacMontecarlo, Mètode de
dc.subject.lemacUlls -- Protecció
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. DRM - Dosimetria i Radiofísica Mèdica
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6498/aaf2c0
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6498/aaf2c0
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac23663452
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
local.citation.authorGinjaume, M.; Carinou, E.; Brodecki, M.; Clairand, I.; Principi, S.
local.citation.publicationNameJournal of radiological protection
local.citation.volume39
local.citation.number1
local.citation.startingPage97
local.citation.endingPage111


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record