Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorHernández Díaz, David
dc.contributor.authorMartos Ferreira, David
dc.contributor.authorHernández Abad, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorVillar Ribera, Ricardo Alberto
dc.contributor.authorTarrés Farrés, Joaquim Agustí
dc.contributor.authorRojas Sola, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d’Enginyeria Gràfica i de Disseny
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Enginyeria Tèxtil i Paperera
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T12:36:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-24T00:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-15
dc.identifier.citationHernandez, D. [et al.]. Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems. "Journal of environmental management", 15 Gener 2021, vol. 278, núm. Part 1, p. 111515:1-111515:8.
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/332173
dc.description.abstractThe use of non-thermal plasma (NTP) generators in air processing systems and their duct networks to improve indoor air quality (IAQ) has grown considerably in recent years. This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of NTP generators for IAQ improvement in biological, chemical and particulate pollutant terms. Also, it assesses and compares the ability of a multipin corona discharge (MPCD) and a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) generator to reduce the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in recycled, unfiltered air in a refrigeration chamber. The MPCD generator was found to have a higher PM2.5 removal efficiency; also, it was faster in removing pollutants, used less energy, and produced much less ozone. The fact that the MPCD generator performed better was seemingly the result of its increased ion production mainly. NTP generators, however, cannot match air filtration media purifiers in this respect as the latter are much more effective in removing particles. Besides, NTP-based air purifying technology continues to be subject to a major drawback, namely: the formation of ozone as a by-product. In any case, the ozone generation was uncorrelated to ion emission when using different technologies
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Enginyeria ambiental
dc.subject.lcshPlasma (Ionized gases)
dc.subject.lcshPlasma engineering
dc.subject.lcshAir quality
dc.subject.otherNon-thermal plasma (NTP)
dc.subject.otherCorona discharge
dc.subject.otherDielectric barrier discharge (DBD)
dc.subject.otherFine particulate matter (PM2.5)
dc.subject.otherOzone (O3)
dc.subject.otherIndoor Air Quality (IAQ)
dc.titleIndoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacPlasma (Gasos ionitzats)
dc.subject.lemacTècniques de plasma
dc.subject.lemacAire -- Qualitat
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111515
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720314407
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac29695472
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
local.citation.authorHernandez, D.; Martos-Ferreira, D.; Hernandez, V.; Villar, R.; Tarrés, Q.; Rojas, J.
local.citation.publicationNameJournal of environmental management
local.citation.volume278
local.citation.numberPart 1
local.citation.startingPage111515:1
local.citation.endingPage111515:8


Fitxers d'aquest items

Thumbnail

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple