Mostra el registre d'ítem simple
Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems
dc.contributor.author | Hernández Díaz, David |
dc.contributor.author | Martos Ferreira, David |
dc.contributor.author | Hernández Abad, Vicente |
dc.contributor.author | Villar Ribera, Ricardo Alberto |
dc.contributor.author | Tarrés Farrés, Joaquim Agustí |
dc.contributor.author | Rojas Sola, José Ignacio |
dc.contributor.other | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d’Enginyeria Gràfica i de Disseny |
dc.contributor.other | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Enginyeria Tèxtil i Paperera |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-13T12:36:01Z |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-24T00:27:07Z |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-15 |
dc.identifier.citation | Hernandez, D. [et al.]. Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems. "Journal of environmental management", 15 Gener 2021, vol. 278, núm. Part 1, p. 111515:1-111515:8. |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-4797 |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2117/332173 |
dc.description.abstract | The use of non-thermal plasma (NTP) generators in air processing systems and their duct networks to improve indoor air quality (IAQ) has grown considerably in recent years. This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of NTP generators for IAQ improvement in biological, chemical and particulate pollutant terms. Also, it assesses and compares the ability of a multipin corona discharge (MPCD) and a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) generator to reduce the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in recycled, unfiltered air in a refrigeration chamber. The MPCD generator was found to have a higher PM2.5 removal efficiency; also, it was faster in removing pollutants, used less energy, and produced much less ozone. The fact that the MPCD generator performed better was seemingly the result of its increased ion production mainly. NTP generators, however, cannot match air filtration media purifiers in this respect as the latter are much more effective in removing particles. Besides, NTP-based air purifying technology continues to be subject to a major drawback, namely: the formation of ozone as a by-product. In any case, the ozone generation was uncorrelated to ion emission when using different technologies |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Enginyeria ambiental |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plasma (Ionized gases) |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plasma engineering |
dc.subject.lcsh | Air quality |
dc.subject.other | Non-thermal plasma (NTP) |
dc.subject.other | Corona discharge |
dc.subject.other | Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) |
dc.subject.other | Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) |
dc.subject.other | Ozone (O3) |
dc.subject.other | Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) |
dc.title | Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems |
dc.type | Article |
dc.subject.lemac | Plasma (Gasos ionitzats) |
dc.subject.lemac | Tècniques de plasma |
dc.subject.lemac | Aire -- Qualitat |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111515 |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720314407 |
dc.rights.access | Open Access |
local.identifier.drac | 29695472 |
dc.description.version | Postprint (author's final draft) |
local.citation.author | Hernandez, D.; Martos-Ferreira, D.; Hernandez, V.; Villar, R.; Tarrés, Q.; Rojas, J. |
local.citation.publicationName | Journal of environmental management |
local.citation.volume | 278 |
local.citation.number | Part 1 |
local.citation.startingPage | 111515:1 |
local.citation.endingPage | 111515:8 |
Fitxers d'aquest items
Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents
-
Articles de revista [342]
-
Articles de revista [30]