Comparison between economic and environmental drivers for demand side aggregator

View/Open
Cita com:
hdl:2117/328985
Document typeArticle
Defense date2020-08
Rights accessOpen Access
All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial
property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public
communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder
Abstract
Demand-side flexibility is a promising source of the energy system that might enhance renewable energy penetration and help to democratize the electricity sector. However, it is not clear what is the best strategy to adopt for Demand Aggregators, especially when flexibility is provided by residential and tertiary buildings. This study compares two Demand Aggregators strategies in the framework of the SABINA (H2020) and the REFER research projects and analyses the effect of CO2 prices on the Demand Aggregator business model. Results show that Demand Response activities reduce both the costs and the building CO2 emissions independently from the strategy adopted.
Description
© 2020 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CitationBarbero, M.; Canals Casals, L.; Corchero, C. Comparison between economic and environmental drivers for demand side aggregator. "Utilities Policy", Agost 2020, vol. 65, núm. 101077, p. 1-10.
ISSN0957-1787
Publisher versionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178720300722
Collections
- Departament d'Enginyeria de Projectes i de la Construcció - Articles de revista [303]
- GNOM - Grup d'Optimització Numèrica i Modelització - Articles de revista [97]
- Doctorat en Estadística i Investigació Operativa - Articles de revista [63]
- GIIP - Grup de Recerca en Enginyeria de Projectes: Disseny, Sostenibilitat i Comunicació - Articles de revista [142]
Files | Description | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
no_mark_COMPARI ... AGGREGATOR APPROACHES.pdf | Article | 1,365Mb | View/Open |