Decentralized vs. centralized economic coordination of resource allocation in grids

View/Open
Document typeConference report
Defense date2003-02-13
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Rights accessOpen Access
All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial
property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public
communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder
Abstract
Application layer networks are software architectures that
allow the provisioning of services requiring a huge amount of resources
by connecting large numbers of individual computers, like in Grid or
Peer-to-Peer computing. Controlling the resource allocation in those networks
is nearly impossible using a centralized arbitrator. The network
simulation project CATNET will evaluate a decentralized mechanism
for resource allocation, which is based on the economic paradigm of the
Catallaxy, against a centralized mechanism using an arbitrator object. In
both versions, software agents buy and sell network services and resources
to and from each other. The economic model is based on self-interested
maximization of utility and self-interested cooperation between agents.
This article describes the setup of money and message flows both for
centralized and decentralized coordination in comparison.
CitationEymann, T; Reinicke, M; Ardaiz, O; Artigas, P; Díaz de Cerio, L; Freitag, F; Messeguer, R; Navarro, L; Royo, D; Sanjeevan, K. Decentralized vs. centralized economic coordination of resource allocation in grids. A: EAGC 2003, p. 9-16.
ISBN978-3-540-21048-1
Files | Description | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
acrossg2003_catnet[1].pdf | 141,5Kb | View/Open |