Microplane model M7 for plain concrete. I: Formulation
View/Open
%28asce%29em%2E1943-7889%2E0000570.pdf (1,163Mb) (Restricted access)
Request copy
Què és aquest botó?
Aquest botó permet demanar una còpia d'un document restringit a l'autor. Es mostra quan:
- Disposem del correu electrònic de l'autor
- El document té una mida inferior a 20 Mb
- Es tracta d'un document d'accés restringit per decisió de l'autor o d'un document d'accés restringit per política de l'editorial
Cita com:
hdl:2117/21405
Document typeArticle
Defense date2013-12-01
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Rights accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work
is licensed under a Creative Commons license
:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Abstract
Mathematical modeling of the nonlinear triaxial behavior and damage of such a complexmaterial as concrete has been a long-standing
challenge in which progress has been made only in gradual increments. The goal of this study is a realistic and robust material model for explicit
finite-element programs for concrete structures that computes the stress tensor from the given strain tensor and some history variables. Themicroplanemodels,
which use a constitutive equation in a vectorial rather than tensorial form and are semimultiscale by virtue of capturing interactions
among phenomena of different orientation, can serve this goal effectively. This paper presents a new concrete microplane model, M7, which
achieves this goal much better than the previous versions M1–M6 developed at Northwestern University since 1985. The basic mathematical
structure of M7 is logically correlated to thermodynamic potentials for the elastic regime, the tensile and compressive damage regimes, and the
frictional slip regime.Given that the volumetric-deviatoric (V-D) split of strains is inevitable for distinguishing between compression failures at low
and high confinement, the key idea is to apply the V-Dsplit only to the microplane compressive stress-strain boundaries (or strain-dependent yield
limits), the sumof which is compared with the total normal stress from the microplane constitutive relation. This avoids the use of the V-D split of
the elastic strains and of the tensile stress-strain boundary, which caused various troubles in M3–M6 such as excessive lateral strains and stress
locking in far postpeak uniaxial extension, poor representation of unloading and loading cycles, and inability to represent high dilatancy under
postpeak compression in lower-strength concretes. Moreover, the differences between high hydrostatic compression and compressive uniaxial
strain are accurately captured by considering the compressive volumetric boundary as dependent on the principal strain difference. The model is
verified extensively in the companion paper.
CitationCaner, F.C.; Bazant, Z.P. Microplane model M7 for plain concrete. I: Formulation. "Journal of engineering mechanics", 01 Desembre 2013, vol. 139, núm. 12, p. 1724-1735.
ISSN0733-9399
Collections
Files | Description | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
%28asce%29em%2E1943-7889%2E0000570.pdf | 1,163Mb | Restricted access |