Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLautenschläger, Carlos E.R.
dc.contributor.authorRighetto, Guilherme L.
dc.contributor.authorInoue, Nelson
dc.contributor.authorDa Fontouura, Sergio A.B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T12:11:26Z
dc.date.available2020-07-08T12:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-941407-6-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/192628
dc.description.abstractAmong the several mechanisms of producing an oil reservoir, the gas expansion mechanism is an important primary recovery process. During the depletion of the reservoir, the pore pressure may reach values below the bubble pressure of the oil, allowing the gas release. From the geomechanical point of view, the change in pore volume, due to production, changes the dynamics of gas generation, since it is dependent upon the change in pore pressure. Studies considering the fluid-mechanical coupling show the relationship between variations of fluid pressure and porous structure of the reservoir. This work aims to study the influence of the fluid-mechanical partial coupling (one and two-way) in the process of gas release during recovery of hydrocarbon. It was used the partial coupling methodology developed by ATHENA/GTEP – PUC-Rio. The model called “A” has only one producing well, while the model called “B” has four injection wells, besides the producer. Initially, the oil present in the reservoir is in undersaturated condition. In model “A” was observed that the pressure drop of fluid is more accentuated, until it reaches the bubble pressure, when considering the two-way coupling. Consequently, the gas release initiation occurs earlier than one-way coupling scheme. After starting gas generation, the rates of pressure change in both partial coupling scenarios tend to equalize. In terms of compaction and subsidence, it was observed most significant displacements values in two-way coupling, highlighting the rigorous consideration of the geomechanical effects in the applied methodology. In model “B”, it was observed that the consideration of the two-way coupling resulted in a recovery scenario without generation of gas, unlike the results shown by the one-way coupling in which gas was generated during 40% of total simulation time. In geomechanical terms it was observed, as presented previously, that the values of vertical displacement were greater in the two-way coupling. The methodology used in this paper proved to be capable of simulating coupled process in a blackoil reservoir, as could be observed by the results. Furthermore, the use of one-way partial coupling scheme, which is widely used in the oil industry, showed results quite different in terms of gas liberation, when are compared with the two-way partial coupling scheme, which was developed in a more rigorous way.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCIMNE
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes en elements finits
dc.subject.lcshFinite element method
dc.subject.lcshCoupled problems (Complex systems) -- Numerical solutions
dc.subject.otherReservoir Geomechanics, Blackoil Reservoir, Fluid-mechanical Coupling, Gas Release, Geomechanical Effect
dc.titleInfluence of fluid-mechanical coupling in gas generation in undersaturated petroleum reservoirs
dc.typeConference report
dc.subject.lemacElements finits, Mètode dels
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.citation.contributorCOUPLED V
local.citation.publicationNameCOUPLED V : proceedings of the V International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering :
local.citation.startingPage794
local.citation.endingPage805


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder