Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorWeyler Pérez, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorOliver Olivella, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorSain, Trisha
dc.contributor.authorCante Terán, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Resistència de Materials i Estructures a l'Enginyeria
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Física
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-03T18:07:25Z
dc.date.available2020-07-03T18:07:25Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.citationWeyler, R. [et al.]. On the contact domain method: a comparison of penalty and Lagrange multiplier implementations. "Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering", Gener 2012, vol. 205-208, núm. 1, p. 68-82.
dc.identifier.issn0045-7825
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/192415
dc.description.abstractThis work focuses on the assessment of the relative performance of the so-called contact domain method, using either the Lagrange multiplier or the penalty strategies. The mathematical formulation of the contact domain method and the imposition of the contact constraints using a stabilized Lagrange multiplier method are taken from the seminal work (as cited later), whereas the penalty based implementation is firstly described here. Although both methods result into equivalent formulations, except for the difference in the constraint imposition strategy, in the Lagrange multiplier method the constraints are enforced using a stabilized formulation based on an interior penalty method, which results into a different estimation of the contact forces compared to the penalty method. Several numerical examples are solved to assess certain numerical intricacies of the two implementations. The results show that both methods perform similarly as one increases the value of the penalty parameter or decreases the value of the stabilization factor (in case of the Lagrange multiplier method). However there seems to exist a clear advantage in using the Lagrange multiplier based strategy in a few critical situations, where the penalty method fails to produce convincing results due to excessive penetration.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Catalan Government Research Department are gratefully acknowledged for their financial support under Grants BIA2008-00411 and 2009 SGR 1510, respectively.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights© 2019. Elsevier
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria mecànica::Mecànica
dc.subject.lcshContact mechanics
dc.subject.otherContact domain method
dc.subject.otherInterior penalty method
dc.subject.otherLagrange multiplier method
dc.subject.otherPenalty method
dc.subject.otherRegularized penalty method
dc.titleOn the contact domain method: a comparison of penalty and Lagrange multiplier implementations
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacMecànica de contacte
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. (MC)2 - Grup de Mecànica Computacional en Medis Continus
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.011
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782511000120
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac9530707
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
local.citation.authorWeyler, R.; Oliver, J.; Sain, T.; Cante, J.C.
local.citation.publicationNameComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering
local.citation.volume205-208
local.citation.number1
local.citation.startingPage68
local.citation.endingPage82


Fitxers d'aquest items

Thumbnail

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple