Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorPuigagut Juárez, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorMaltais-Laundry, Grabriel
dc.contributor.authorGagnon, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorBrisson, Jacques
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica, Marítima i Ambiental
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-09T16:11:18Z
dc.date.created2012-06
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.citationPuigagut, J. [et al.]. Are ciliated protozoa communities affected by macrophyte species, date of sampling and location in horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands?. "Water research", Juny 2012, vol. 46, núm. 9, p. 3005-3013.
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/18745
dc.description.abstractThe effects of design and operational factors on the dynamics of ciliated protozoa in constructed wetlands (CWs) treating wastewater remain poorly known, although bacterivory by ciliates could have important implications for nutrient cycling in these systems. We conducted a greenhouse experiment with eight wetland mesocosms (1 m2) fed with synthetic wastewater to assess how macrophyte species (Phragmites australis, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha angustifolia), location within CW (longitudinal, depth), and temporal fluctuations affect ciliate abundance and diversity. Urosoma similis was the most abundant taxon, but Hypotrichidae, Scuticociliates, Drepomonas revoluta, and Acineria uncinata were also abundant. Longitudinal location had the highest impact on ciliate dynamics, with more abundant and diverse communities in the initial section of wetlands. P. australis/T. angustifolia and P. arundinacea had the most and least favorable conditions for ciliates, respectively, but differences among macrophytes were mostly not significant. Ciliate abundance appeared to decline from August to November, most likely because of lower temperature and plant inputs of organic matter and oxygen. Depth had no apparent impact on ciliate dynamics, suggesting that sampling at multiple depths in CW is not necessary to adequately monitor ciliate communities. Overall, our results suggest that macrophytes, location, and date of sampling influenced ciliated dynamics but stress the need for direct manipulative experiments of ciliate abundance, diversity, and composition conducted on a full annual cycle to better understand the impact of ciliates on nutrient cycling in CWs. This is especially true to determine if the associations found in our principal component analysis are robust.
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geologia::Hidrologia
dc.subject.lcshConstructed wetlands
dc.subject.lcshCiliata -- Ecology
dc.titleAre ciliated protozoa communities affected by macrophyte species, date of sampling and location in horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands?
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacZones humides artificials
dc.subject.lemacProtozous
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GEMMA - Grup d'Enginyeria i Microbiologia del Medi Ambient
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.001
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135412001510
dc.rights.accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
local.identifier.drac11720558
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
dc.date.lift10000-01-01
local.citation.authorPuigagut, J.; Maltais-Laundry, G.; Gagnon, V.; Brisson, J.
local.citation.publicationNameWater research
local.citation.volume46
local.citation.number9
local.citation.startingPage3005
local.citation.endingPage3013


Fitxers d'aquest items

Imatge en miniatura

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple