Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorbella Vidal, Clara
dc.contributor.authorPuigagut Juárez, Jaume
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica, Marítima i Ambiental
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-09T15:08:52Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationCorbella, C.; Puigagut, J. Improving the reliability of closed chamber methodologies for methane emissions measurement in treatment wetlands. A: International Conference Wetlands Systems for Water Pollution Control. "13th International Conference Wetlands Systems for Water Pollution Control". Perth: 2013, p. 1-9.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/18741
dc.description.abstractNon-homogeneous mixing of methane (NHM) within closed chambers was studied under laboratory conditions. The experimental set up consisted of a PVC vented chamber of 5.3 litres of effective volume implemented with a power-adjustable 12V fan. NHM was addressed by injecting a known volume of methane and extracting, afterwards, gas samples from the top, middle and bottom sections of the chamber. NHM within the chamber was studied under different experimental situations such as the fan position (top vs lateral), fan airflow strength (23 vs 80 cubic feet per minute) and the mixing time before sample withdrawal (5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes). The potential bias of methane flux densities caused by NHM was addressed by monitoring the difference between linearly expected and estimated flux densities of ca. 400, ca. 800 and ca. 1600 mg CH4.m-2.d-1. Results showed that methane within the chamber was under non-homogeneous conditions. Accordingly, for mixing times before sample withdrawal ranging from 5 to 20 minutes methane concentrations at the bottom of the chamber were between 20% to 70% higher than those recorded at the middle or top sections of the chamber, regardless the fan position or fan airflow strength. Furthermore, NHM led to notable biases on flux density estimation. Accordingly, flux density estimated from top and middle sampling sections were systematically lower (ca. 50%) than those expected, regardless the flux density considered. Alternatively, flux densities estimated from bottom samples showed a lesser bias (between 10% higher to 25% lower than expected flux densities).
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geologia::Hidrologia
dc.subject.lcshConstructed wetlands
dc.subject.otherNon-homogeneous mixing
dc.subject.otherMethane emission
dc.subject.otherClosed chamber
dc.subject.otherMethane flux densities
dc.titleImproving the reliability of closed chamber methodologies for methane emissions measurement in treatment wetlands
dc.typeConference report
dc.subject.lemacZones humides artificials
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GEMMA - Grup d'Enginyeria i Microbiologia del Medi Ambient
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://gesad.ufsc.br/papers/IWAPuigaJ%232.pdf
dc.rights.accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
drac.iddocument11720550
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308502/EU/Safeguarding Water resources in INdia with Green and Sustainable technologies/SWINGS
dc.date.lift10000-01-01
upcommons.citation.authorCorbella, C.; Puigagut, J.
upcommons.citation.contributorInternational Conference Wetlands Systems for Water Pollution Control
upcommons.citation.pubplacePerth
upcommons.citation.publishedtrue
upcommons.citation.publicationName13th International Conference Wetlands Systems for Water Pollution Control
upcommons.citation.startingPage1
upcommons.citation.endingPage9


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder