Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Mike
dc.contributor.authorFotopoulou, Stavroula
dc.contributor.authorPitilakis, Kyiriazis
dc.contributor.authorMavrouli, Olga Christina
dc.contributor.authorCorominas Dulcet, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorArgyroudis, Sotiris
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria del Terreny, Cartogràfica i Geofísica
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-13T20:04:33Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSmith, J. [et al.]. The physical vulnerability of roads to debris flows: an expert judgement approach. A: International Symposium on Landslides. "Landslides and Engineered Slopes". Banff: CRC Press. Taylor & Francies Group, 2013, p. 307-313.
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-415-62123-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/18292
dc.description.abstractThe physical vulnerability of roads to debris flow is expressed through fragility functions that relate flow volume to damage probabilities. Fragility relationships are essential components of quantitative risk assessments (QRA) as they allow for the estimation of risk within a consequence-based framework. To the best of the Authors’ knowledge this is the first time that fragility curves have been produced in order to provide the conditional probability for a road to be in, or to exceed, a certain damage state for a given debris flow volume. Preliminary assessments were undertaken by means of a detailed questionnaire. A total of 47 returns were received from experts in 17 countries: 32% academia, 51% the commercial sector and 17% governments. Fragility curves have been defined for three damage states (limited damage, serious damage and destroyed) for each of low speed and high speed roads in order to cover the typical characteristics of roads vulnerable to debris flow. The probability of any given damage state being met or exceeded by a debris flow of a given volume (10 to 100,000m3) was derived from the mean of the responses received. Inevitably there was a degree of scatter in the results and the treatment of such variation, or ‘experimental errors’, was crucial to understanding the data and to developing the fragility curves. Both qualitative and quantitative methods of arriving at these preliminary fragility curves were utilised. The nature of the data is such that unless all respondents return that value the average probability at the largest flow volume cannot reach unity; as a result the upper ends of each curve were forced to unity and in order to account for larger potential volumes manual extrapolation was undertaken to 1,000,000m3. In addition to an assessment of the probabilities of given damage states being exceeded respondents to the questionnaire were polled as to their level of experience and confidence in their ability to provide a valid and coherent set of answers to the questions posed.
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCRC Press. Taylor & Francies Group
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geologia::Riscos geològics
dc.subject.lcshDebris avalanches
dc.titleThe physical vulnerability of roads to debris flows: an expert judgement approach
dc.typeConference lecture
dc.subject.lemacEsllavissades
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. MSR - Mecànica del Sòls i de les Roques
dc.rights.accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
local.identifier.drac11673030
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
dc.date.lift10000-01-01
local.citation.authorSmith, J.; Winter, M.; Fotopoulou, S.; Pitilakis, K.; Mavrouli, O.; Corominas, J.; Argyroudis, S.
local.citation.contributorInternational Symposium on Landslides
local.citation.pubplaceBanff
local.citation.publicationNameLandslides and Engineered Slopes
local.citation.startingPage307
local.citation.endingPage313


Fitxers d'aquest items

Imatge en miniatura

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple