Assessment of earth retaining wall sustainability: value functions and stakeholder weighting sensitivity
GeoMEast-2019_Sustainability_vff.pdf (849,2Kb) (Restricted access) Request copy
Què és aquest botó?
Aquest botó permet demanar una còpia d'un document restringit a l'autor. Es mostra quan:
- Disposem del correu electrònic de l'autor
- El document té una mida inferior a 20 Mb
- Es tracta d'un document d'accés restringit per decisió de l'autor o d'un document d'accés restringit per política de l'editorial
Document typeConference report
Rights accessRestricted access - publisher's policy (embargoed until 2020-11-01)
Earth retaining walls are common geotechnical structures with a wide range of solutions available to perform the same function. More and more, geotechnical engineers are asked to find the best solution among several options in different civil engineering applications based on environmental impact, cost and societal/functional issues. Evaluation of these three pillars during the selection process of a structure (such as an earth retaining wall) is called a sustainability assessment. This paper describes a sustainability assessment methodology and gives examples to select the best sustainable option from candidate conventional gravity and cantilever wall types, and steel and polymeric soil reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls of 5 m height. Analyses were carried out using the MIVES methodology which is based on value theory and multi-attribute assumptions. The paper identifies how indicator issues are scored, weighted and aggregated to generate final numerical scores that allow solution options to be ranked. The final scores include an adjustment based on stakeholder preferences for the relative importance of the three sustainability pillars (environmental, economic (cost) and societal/functional). The analysis results show that MSE wall solutions are most often the best option in each category compared to conventional gravity and cantilever wall solutions and thus most often the final choice when scores from each pillar were aggregated to a final score. The paper also includes a sensitivity analysis of the choice of value functions and stakeholder weighting preferences on the final ranking scores used to select the best sustainable solution. The analyses also show that the choice of value function and stakeholder preferences can lead to a conventional structure being the best option.
CitationDamians, I.P. [et al.]. Assessment of earth retaining wall sustainability: value functions and stakeholder weighting sensitivity. A: GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition. "Innovative Solutions for Deep Foundations and Retaining Structures: Proceedings of the 3rd GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition, Egypt 2019 on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures". Springer Nature, 2019, p. 73-88.
All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder