Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlanco de Tena Davila, David
dc.contributor.authorAltman, D.G.
dc.contributor.authorMoher, David
dc.contributor.authorBoutron, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorKirkham, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorCobo Valeri, Erik
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Estadística i Investigació Operativa
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa
dc.identifier.citationBlanco, D. [et al.]. Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research. "BMJ Open", 1 Maig 2019, vol. 9, núm. 5, p. e02658-1-e02658-12.
dc.description.abstractObjectives The goal of this study is to identify, analyse and classify interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in order to obtain a wide picture of how the problem of enhancing the completeness of reporting of biomedical literature has been tackled so far. Design Scoping review. Search strategy We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and conducted a grey literature search for (1) studies evaluating interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research and (2) other types of references describing interventions that have been performed or suggested but never evaluated. The characteristics and effect of the evaluated interventions were analysed. Moreover, we explored the rationale of the interventions identified and determined the existing gaps in research on the evaluation of interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines. Results 109 references containing 31 interventions (11 evaluated) were included. These were grouped into five categories: (1) training on the use of reporting guidelines, (2) improving understanding, (3) encouraging adherence, (4) checking adherence and providing feedback, and (5) involvement of experts. Additionally, we identified lack of evaluated interventions (1) on training on the use of reporting guidelines and improving their understanding, (2) at early stages of research and (3) after the final acceptance of the manuscript. Conclusions This scoping review identified a wide range of strategies to improve adherence to reporting guidelines that can be taken by different stakeholders. Additional research is needed to assess the effectiveness of many of these interventions
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la salut
dc.subject.lcshMedical sciences --Research
dc.titleScoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
dc.subject.lemacCiències mèdiques -- Investigació
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GRBIO - Grup de Recerca en Bioestadística i Bioinformàtica
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
upcommons.citation.authorBlanco, D.; Altman, D.; Moher, D.; Boutron, I.; Kirkham, J.; Cobo, E.
upcommons.citation.publicationNameBMJ Open

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain