Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaipuri, Mahendra
dc.contributor.authorFernández Méndez, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorTiago, Carlos
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-01T15:37:13Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T15:37:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citationPaipuri, M.; Fernandez, S.; Tiago, C. Comparison of high-order continuous and hybridizable discontinuous {G}alerkin methods in incompressible fluid flow problems. "Mathematics and computers in simulation", 1 Octubre 2018, vol. 153, p. 35-58.
dc.identifier.issn0378-4754
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/131081
dc.description© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.description.abstractThe computational efficiency and the stability of Continuous Galerkin (CG) methods, with Taylor–Hood approximations, and Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) methods are compared for the solution of the incompressible Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations at low Reynolds numbers using direct solvers. A thorough comparison in terms of CPU time and accuracy for both discretization methods is made, under the same platform, for steady state problems, with triangular and quadrilateral elements of degree . Various results are presented such as error vs. CPU time of the direct solver, error vs. ratio of CPU times of HDG to CG, etc. CG can outperform HDG when the CPU time, for a given degree and mesh, is considered. However, for high degree of approximation, HDG is computationally more efficient than CG, for a given level of accuracy, as HDG produces lesser error than CG for a given mesh and degree. Finally, stability of HDG and CG is studied using a manufactured solution that produces a sharp boundary layer, confirming that HDG provides smooth converged solutions for Reynolds numbers higher than CG, in the presence of sharp fronts.
dc.format.extent24 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística
dc.subject.otherEfficiency
dc.subject.otherHybridizable discontinuous Galerkin
dc.subject.otherStability
dc.subject.otherNavier–Stokes
dc.subject.otherTaylor–Hood finite elements
dc.titleComparison of high-order continuous and hybridizable discontinuous {G}alerkin methods in incompressible fluid flow problems
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. LACÀN - Mètodes Numèrics en Ciències Aplicades i Enginyeria
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.matcom.2018.05.012
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.subject.amsClassificació AMS::11 Number theory
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378475418301241?via%3Dihub
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac23231893
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/1PE/MTM2013-46313-R
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GTAT.CATAL-DEPT.UNIV.I RECERCA/2001-2004/2001SGR-00257
local.citation.authorPaipuri, M.; Fernandez, S.; Tiago, C.
local.citation.publicationNameMathematics and computers in simulation
local.citation.volume153
local.citation.startingPage35
local.citation.endingPage58


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license : Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain