On the meanings of subsetting, specialization and redefinition in UML
Visualitza/Obre
Estadístiques de LA Referencia / Recolecta
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/12827
Tipus de documentReport de recerca
Data publicació2011-06-27
Condicions d'accésAccés obert
Llevat que s'hi indiqui el contrari, els
continguts d'aquesta obra estan subjectes a la llicència de Creative Commons
:
Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 3.0 Espanya
Abstract
UML 2 has improved the expressiveness of the language with respect to associations in several manners. A significant one has been the introduction of the association redefinition concept. Association subsetting and association specialization have been included in UML since its earliest versions and share some relevant features with association redefinition. These similarities among the three constructs make it frequently difficult, especially to novice users, to: decide which one of these concepts is the best suited to model a particular situation; systematically justify their modelling choices.
In this report, we present a preliminary empirical investigation on these constructs using as a benchmark a catalogue of model examples produced by different authors which can be considered experts in the conceptual modelling field.
Forma partESSI-TR-11-1
Col·leccions
- Departament d'Enginyeria de Serveis i Sistemes d'Informació - Reports de recerca [154]
- inSSIDE - integrated Software, Service, Information and Data Engineering - Reports de recerca [41]
- MPI - Modelització i processament de la Informació - Reports de recerca [46]
- GESSI - Grup d'Enginyeria del Software i dels Serveis - Reports de recerca [32]
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
ReportER2011.pdf | Article principal | 338,4Kb | Visualitza/Obre |