Show simple item record

dc.contributorGómez Valentín, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBoix Oliva, Júlia
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-03T13:29:54Z
dc.date.available2018-06-03T13:29:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/117755
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this work is to analyse the two different turbulence methodologies, LES and RANS, using three numerical OpenFOAM simulations based on the Finite Volume Method. Also, the non-hydrostatic effects produced by the highly curved surface are analysed. In order to assess the 3D model, two dam-break experiments are used to calibrate (Kleefsman et al., 2005) and validate (Fraccarollo and Toro, 1995) the model, respectively. LES methodology is simulated using Smagorinsky submodel while in RANS the RNG kepsilon is used. To simulate the water surface, the Volume of Fluid and the interFoam solver are used. A computer with 32 GB of RAM memory and Intel Core i7-6700k processor is used to simulate the experiments. The computational time to simulate the second experiment with 1 cm mesh is around 2 days. In conclusion both models simulate quite well the water height, whereas the pressure results are less precise. Even though, Smagorinsky model gets better results in the first experiment. In the second experiment, Smagorinsky model shows that it is able to follow the variability in time of the variables under study; however, there are parts in which the model underestimates the values while in others it overestimates the values. Regarding to the comparison, done in this experiment, between the pressure head and the water height, they are not equal when there is a highly curved water surface.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil
dc.subject.lcshComputer simulation
dc.subject.otherOpenFOAM
dc.subject.otherdam-break
dc.subject.otherturbulence models
dc.subject.other3D simulation
dc.titleComparative evaluation of two different 3D OpenFOAM modules in a dam-break test
dc.typeBachelor thesis
dc.subject.lemacSimulació per ordinador
dc.identifier.slugPRISMA-121197
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.date.updated2017-07-26T18:01:53Z
dc.audience.educationlevelGrau
dc.audience.mediatorEscola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers de Camins, Canals i Ports de Barcelona


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Spain