Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPuig Damians, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorBathurst, Richard
dc.contributor.authorAdroguer, Eduard G.
dc.contributor.authorJosa Garcia-Tornel, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorLloret Morancho, Antonio
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T18:03:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationDamians, I.P., Bathurst, R.J., Adroguer, E., Josa, A., Lloret, A. Sustainability assessment of earth-retaining wall structures. "Environmental geotechnics", Agost 2018, vol. 5, núm. 4, p. 187-203.
dc.identifier.issn2051-803X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/306441595_Sustainability_assessment_of_earth-retaining_wall_structures
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/116921
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a sustainability assessment methodology and example to select the best sustainable option from candidate conventional gravity and cantilever wall types and steel and polymeric soil-reinforced, mechanically stabilised earth (MSE) walls of different heights. Analyses were carried out using the value integrated model for sustainable evaluations (Mives) methodology, which is based on value theory and multi-attribute assumptions. The paper identifies how indicator issues are scored, weighted and aggregated to generate final numerical scores that allow solution options to be ranked. The final scores include an adjustment based on stakeholder preferences for the relative importance of the three sustainability pillars (environmental, economic and societal/functional). The analysis results show that MSE wall solutions were most often the best option in each category compared to conventional gravity and cantilever wall solutions and, thus, most often they were the final choice when scores from each pillar were aggregated to a final score. However, when cost was weighted most highly of the three pillars, then the conventional wall solutions gave the highest (best) Mives score for walls 3m high. If environmental issues were the most important concern of stakeholders, then the MSE solutions were the best solution, particularly for walls 5m high and higher.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geotècnia::Fonaments
dc.subject.lcshRetaining walls
dc.subject.otherreinforced soils
dc.subject.otherretaining walls
dc.subject.othersustainability
dc.titleSustainability assessment of earth-retaining wall structures
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacMurs de contenció
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. MECMAT - Mecànica de Materials
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. MSR - Mecànica del Sòls i de les Roques
dc.identifier.doi10.1680/jenge.16.00004
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/jenge.16.00004
dc.rights.accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
drac.iddocument18852781
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
dc.date.lift10000-01-01
upcommons.citation.authorDamians, I.P., Bathurst, R.J., Adroguer, E., Josa, A., Lloret, A.
upcommons.citation.publishedtrue
upcommons.citation.publicationNameEnvironmental geotechnics
upcommons.citation.volume5
upcommons.citation.number4
upcommons.citation.startingPage187
upcommons.citation.endingPage203


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All rights reserved. This work is protected by the corresponding intellectual and industrial property rights. Without prejudice to any existing legal exemptions, reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation of this work are prohibited without permission of the copyright holder