Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorCHANCE, GREG
dc.contributor.authorJevtic, Aleksandar
dc.contributor.authorCaleb-Solly, Praminda
dc.contributor.authorDogramadzi, Sanja
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-02T11:16:24Z
dc.date.available2017-10-02T11:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCHANCE, G., Jevtic, A., Caleb-Solly, P., Dogramadzi, S. A quantitative analysis of dressing dynamics for robotic dressing assistance. "Frontiers in Robotics and AI", 2017, vol. 4, núm. 13, p. 1-14.
dc.identifier.issn2296-9144
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/108265
dc.description.abstractAssistive robots have a great potential to address issues related to an aging population and an increased demand for caregiving. Successful deployment of robots working in close proximity with people requires consideration of both safety and human–robot interaction (HRI). One of the established activities of daily living where robots could play an assistive role is dressing. Using the correct force profile for robot control will be essential in this application of HRI requiring careful exploration of factors related to the user’s pose and the type of garments involved. In this paper, a Baxter robot was used to dress a jacket onto a mannequin and human participants considering several combinations of user pose and clothing type (base layers), while recording dynamic data from the robot, a load cell, and an IMU. We also report on suitability of these sensors for identifying dressing errors, e.g., fabric snagging. Data were analyzed by comparing the overlap of confidence intervals to determine sensitivity to dressing. We expand the analysis to include classification techniques such as decision tree and support vector machines using k-fold cross-validation. The 6-axis load cell successfully discriminated between clothing types with predictive model accuracies between 72 and 97%. Used independently, the IMU and Baxter sensors were insufficient to discriminate garment types with the IMU showing 40–72% accuracy, but when used in combination this pair of sensors achieved an accuracy similar to the more expensive load cell (98%). When observing dressing errors (snagging), Baxter’s sensors and the IMU data demonstrated poor sensitivity but applying machine learning methods resulted in model with high predicative accuracy and low false negative rates (=5%). The results show that the load cell could be used independently for this application with good accuracy but a combination of the lower cost sensors could also be used without a significant loss in precision, which will be a key element in the robot control architecture for safe HRI.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Robòtica
dc.subject.lcshHuman-robot interaction
dc.subject.othergeneralisation (artificial intelligence)
dc.subject.otherpattern classification
dc.subject.otherservice robots. human-robot interaction
dc.subject.otherassistive robots
dc.titleA quantitative analysis of dressing dynamics for robotic dressing assistance
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacInteracció persona-robot
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/frobt.2017.00013
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2017.00013/full
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.identifier.drac21556792
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/287654/EU/European Coordinated Research on Long-term Challenges in Information and Communication Sciences and Technologies/CHIST-ERA II
local.citation.authorCHANCE, G.; Jevtic, A.; Caleb-Solly, P.; Dogramadzi, S.
local.citation.publicationNameFrontiers in Robotics and AI
local.citation.volume4
local.citation.number13
local.citation.startingPage1
local.citation.endingPage14


Fitxers d'aquest items

Thumbnail

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

    Mostra el registre d'ítem simple