Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMesodiakaki, Agapi
dc.contributor.authorKassler, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorZola, Enrica Valeria
dc.contributor.authorFerndahl, Mattias
dc.contributor.authorCai, Tao
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Telemàtica
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T14:25:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMesodiakaki, A., Kassler, A.J., Zola, E., Ferndahl, M., Cai, T. Energy efficient line-of-sight millimeter wave small cell backhaul: 60, 70, 80 or 140 GHz?. A: International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. "2016 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile, and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)". Coimbra: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2016, p. 1-9.
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5090-2185-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/104321
dc.description.abstractSpectrum scarcity together with high capacity demands make the use of millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies an interesting alternative for next generation, i.e., fifth generation (5G), networks. Although mmWave is expected to play a key role for both access network and backhaul (BH), its initial use in the BH network seems more straight-forward. This stems from the fact that, in the BH case, its deployment is less challenging due to the fixed locations of BH transceivers. Still, provided that mmWave spectrum consists of several subbands, each one with different characteristics and thus different deployment constraints (e.g., channel bandwidth, maximum transmission power), a comparison is required in order to gain a better insight into the potentials of each solution. To that end, in this paper, the main mmWave candidate frequency bands are compared in terms of range, throughput and energy consumption. In our results, the bandwidth availability, the maximum transmission power as well as the antenna gains of each BH technology are taken into account, as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. The results are also compared with current industry-oriented state-of-the-art transceiver characteristics in order to gain further insights into the maximum achievable gains of each subband.
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació
dc.subject.lcshWireless communication systems
dc.subject.otherBandwidth
dc.subject.other5G mobile communication
dc.subject.otherTransmitting antennas
dc.subject.otherAttenuation
dc.subject.otherThroughput
dc.subject.otherWireless communication
dc.subject.otherPower demand
dc.titleEnergy efficient line-of-sight millimeter wave small cell backhaul: 60, 70, 80 or 140 GHz?
dc.typeConference report
dc.subject.lemacComunicació sense fil, Sistemes de
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GRXCA - Grup de Recerca en Xarxes de Comunicacions Cel·lulars i Ad-hoc
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/WoWMoM.2016.7523521
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7523521/
dc.rights.accessRestricted access - publisher's policy
local.identifier.drac18721667
dc.description.versionPostprint (published version)
dc.date.lift10000-01-01
local.citation.authorMesodiakaki, A.; Kassler, A.J.; Zola, E.; Ferndahl, M.; Cai, T.
local.citation.contributorInternational Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks
local.citation.pubplaceCoimbra
local.citation.publicationName2016 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile, and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)
local.citation.startingPage1
local.citation.endingPage9


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record