Mostra el registre d'ítem simple
Testing methodologies for quantifying physical models uncertainties. A comparative exercise using CIRCE and IPREM (FFTBM)
dc.contributor.author | Freixa Terradas, Jordi |
dc.contributor.author | Alfonso Prieto-Puga, Elsa de |
dc.contributor.author | Reventós Puigjaner, Francesc Josep |
dc.contributor.other | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Física |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-17T12:34:08Z |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-15 |
dc.identifier.citation | Freixa, J., De Alfonso, E., Reventós, F. Testing methodologies for quantifying physical models uncertainties. A comparative exercise using CIRCE and IPREM (FFTBM). "Nuclear engineering and design", 15 Agost 2016, vol. 305, p. 653-665. |
dc.identifier.issn | 0029-5493 |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2117/101182 |
dc.description.abstract | The increasing importance of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) analyses in nuclear safety and licensing processes have lead to several international activities. The latest findings highlighted the uncertainties of physical models as one of the most controversial aspects of BEPU. This type of uncertainties is an important contributor to the total uncertainty of NPP BE calculations. Due to the complexity of estimating this uncertainty, it is often assessed solely by engineering judgment. The present study comprises a comparison of two different state-of-the-art methodologies CIRCÉ and IPREM (FFTBM) capable of quantifying the uncertainty of physical models. Similarities and differences of their results are discussed through the observation of probability distribution functions and envelope calculations. In particular, the analyzed scenario is core reflood. Experimental data from the FEBA and PERICLES test facilities is employed while the thermal hydraulic simulations are carried out with RELAP5/mod3.3. This work is undertaken under the framework of PREMIUM (Post-BEMUSE Reflood Model Input Uncertainty Methods) benchmark. |
dc.format.extent | 13 p. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies::Energia nuclear |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Física |
dc.subject.lcsh | Nuclear power plants |
dc.subject.lcsh | Probabilities |
dc.subject.lcsh | Nuclear physics |
dc.title | Testing methodologies for quantifying physical models uncertainties. A comparative exercise using CIRCE and IPREM (FFTBM) |
dc.type | Article |
dc.subject.lemac | Centrals nuclears |
dc.subject.lemac | Probabilitats |
dc.subject.lemac | Física nuclear |
dc.contributor.group | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. ANT - Advanced Nuclear Technologies Research Group |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.037 |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://www.sciencedirect.com.recursos.biblioteca.upc.edu/science/article/pii/S0029549316301704 |
dc.rights.access | Restricted access - publisher's policy |
local.identifier.drac | 19702507 |
dc.description.version | Postprint (published version) |
dc.date.lift | 10000-01-01 |
local.citation.author | Freixa, J.; De Alfonso, E.; Reventós, F. |
local.citation.publicationName | Nuclear engineering and design |
local.citation.volume | 305 |
local.citation.startingPage | 653 |
local.citation.endingPage | 665 |
Fitxers d'aquest items
Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents
-
Articles de revista [2.209]
-
Articles de revista [151]