Testing methodologies for quantifying physical models uncertainties. A comparative exercise using CIRCE and IPREM (FFTBM)
Visualitza/Obre
1-s2.0-S0029549316301704-main.pdf (2,689Mb) (Accés restringit)
Sol·licita una còpia a l'autor
Què és aquest botó?
Aquest botó permet demanar una còpia d'un document restringit a l'autor. Es mostra quan:
- Disposem del correu electrònic de l'autor
- El document té una mida inferior a 20 Mb
- Es tracta d'un document d'accés restringit per decisió de l'autor o d'un document d'accés restringit per política de l'editorial
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.037
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/101182
Tipus de documentArticle
Data publicació2016-08-15
Condicions d'accésAccés restringit per política de l'editorial
Llevat que s'hi indiqui el contrari, els
continguts d'aquesta obra estan subjectes a la llicència de Creative Commons
:
Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 3.0 Espanya
Abstract
The increasing importance of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) analyses in nuclear safety and licensing processes have lead to several international activities. The latest findings highlighted the uncertainties of physical models as one of the most controversial aspects of BEPU. This type of uncertainties is an important contributor to the total uncertainty of NPP BE calculations. Due to the complexity of estimating this uncertainty, it is often assessed solely by engineering judgment. The present study comprises a comparison of two different state-of-the-art methodologies CIRCÉ and IPREM (FFTBM) capable of quantifying the uncertainty of physical models. Similarities and differences of their results are discussed through the observation of probability distribution functions and envelope calculations. In particular, the analyzed scenario is core reflood. Experimental data from the FEBA and PERICLES test facilities is employed while the thermal hydraulic simulations are carried out with RELAP5/mod3.3. This work is undertaken under the framework of PREMIUM (Post-BEMUSE Reflood Model Input Uncertainty Methods) benchmark.
CitacióFreixa, J., De Alfonso, E., Reventós, F. Testing methodologies for quantifying physical models uncertainties. A comparative exercise using CIRCE and IPREM (FFTBM). "Nuclear engineering and design", 15 Agost 2016, vol. 305, p. 653-665.
ISSN0029-5493
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0029549316301704-main.pdf | 2,689Mb | Accés restringit |