Ir al contenido (pulsa Retorno)

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

    • Català
    • Castellano
    • English
    • LoginRegisterLog in (no UPC users)
  • mailContact Us
  • world English 
    • Català
    • Castellano
    • English
  • userLogin   
      LoginRegisterLog in (no UPC users)

UPCommons. Global access to UPC knowledge

13.331 Articles in journals published by the UPC
You are here:
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Revistes
  • ACE: architecture, city and environment
  • 2009, Año 03, núm. 9 Febrero
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Revistes
  • ACE: architecture, city and environment
  • 2009, Año 03, núm. 9 Febrero
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

O significado da justa indenizaçäo nas decisöes judiciais

Thumbnail
View/Open
ACE_9_SA_13.pdf (197,7Kb)
Share:
 
 
10.5821/ace.v3i9.2475
 
  View Usage Statistics
Cita com:
hdl:2099/8038

Show full item record
Teixeira de Souza, Adriana
Document typeArticle
Defense date2009
PublisherCentre de Política del Sòl i Valoracions - Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Rights accessOpen Access
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons license : Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain
Abstract
O artigo examina o pagamento da indenização na desapropriação de imóveis urbanos e rurais no Brasil, através da análise de decisões judiciais. O exame das decisões avalia o problema na interpretação do conceito de justa indenização pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Os procedimentos empregados na pesquisa foram a catalogação de decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal em matéria de desapropriação. O objetivo foi verificar a compatibilidade da indenização fixada nos casos concretos com a justa indenização almejada pela Constituição de 1988 e pelas leis federais que dispõem sobre desapropriação. Dado esse objetivo, foram selecionadas apenas as decisões posteriores à Constituição de 1988. O âmbito da pesquisa compreendeu a análise de 53 julgados. Foram contemplados três temas freqüentemente discutidos na fundamentação das decisões e os argumentos utilizados pelos julgadores. O artigo permite observar como a interpretação dada à justa indenização tem se distanciado do ideal de bem comum e justiça social. / The article examines the payment of compensation for expropriated property in urban and rural areas in Brazil, through the study of judicial decisions. The analysis of judicial decisions examines the problem in the interpretation of the just compensation clause by the Brazil Supreme Court. The procedures used in the research were the cataloging of the Supreme Court decisions on expropriation. The objective was to verify the compatibility of the decided value with the fair compensation sought by the 1988 Constitution and by federal laws about expropriation by government. The scope of the research included analysis of 53 trials. Three themes frequently discussed in the judicial decisions were considered, as well as the reasons exposed by judges to enforce their arguments. The article allows to conclude that the meaning of the just compensation clause given by judges of the Brazil Supreme Court has been distanced from the ideal of the common good and social justice.
 
The article examines the payment of compensation for expropriated property in urban and rural areas in Brazil, through the study of judicial decisions. The analysis of judicial decisions examines the problem in the interpretation of the just compensation clause by the Brazil Supreme Court. The procedures used in the research were the cataloging of the Supreme Court decisions on expropriation. The objective was to verify the compatibility of the decided value with the fair compensation sought by the 1988 Constitution and by federal laws about expropriation by government. The scope of the research included analysis of 53 trials. Three themes frequently discussed in the judicial decisions were considered, as well as the reasons exposed by judges to enforce their arguments. The article allows to conclude that the meaning of the just compensation clause given by judges of the Brazil Supreme Court has been distanced from the ideal of the common good and social justice.
 
El artículo examina la compensación para la expropiación de la propiedad en áreas urbanas y rurales en Brasil, mediante un estudio de decisiones judiciales. El análisis de decisiones judiciales examina el problema en la interpretación de la clausula de la justa compensación por el Tribunal Supremo de Brasil. Los procedimientos utilizados en la investigación fueron la catalogación de las decisiones del Tribunal Supremo sobre la expropiación. El objetivo fue de verificar la compatibilidad del valor decidido con la compensación justa, planteado por la Constitución de 1988 y por leyes federales en cuanto a la expropiación por parte del gobierno. El alcance de la investigación incluye el análisis de 53 casos. Se consideran tres temas discutidos con frecuencia en las decisiones judiciales, así como las razones expuestas por jueces para imponer sus argumentos. El artículo permite concluir que el significado de la cláusula de justa compensación dada por jueces del Tribunal Supremo de Brasil ha sido desvinculado del ideal del bien común y de la justicia social.
 
L'article examina la compensació per l'expropiació de la propietat en àrees urbanes i rurals al Brasil, mitjançant un estudi de decisions judicials. L'anàlisi de decisions judicials examina el problema en la interpretació de la clàusula de la justa compensació pel Tribunal Suprem del Brasil. Els procediments utilitzats en la investigació van ser la catalogació de les decisions del Tribunal Suprem sobre l'expropiació. L'objectiu va ser de verificar la compatibilitat del valor decidit amb la compensació justa, plantejat per la Constitució de 1988 i per lleis federals quant a l'expropiació per part del govern. L'abast de la investigació inclou l'anàlisi de 53 casos. Es consideren tres temes discutits amb freqüència en les decisions judicials, així com les raons exposades per jutges per imposar els seus arguments. L'article permet concloure que el significat de la clàusula de justa compensació donada per jutges del Tribunal Suprem de Brasil ha estat desvinculat de l'ideal del bé comú i de la justícia social
CitationTeixeira de Souza, Adriana. O significado da justa indenizaçäo nas decisöes judiciais. "ACE: architecture, city and environment", 2009, vol. Any III, núm. 9, p. 57-70. 
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2099/8038
DOI10.5821/ace.v3i9.2475
ISSN1886-4805
Collections
  • ACE: architecture, city and environment - 2009, Año 03, núm. 9 Febrero [5]
Share:
 
  View Usage Statistics

Show full item record

FilesDescriptionSizeFormatView
ACE_9_SA_13.pdf197,7KbPDFView/Open

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsOther contributionsTitlesSubjectsThis repositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsOther contributionsTitlesSubjects

© UPC Obrir en finestra nova . Servei de Biblioteques, Publicacions i Arxius

info.biblioteques@upc.edu

  • About This Repository
  • Contact Us
  • Send Feedback
  • Inici de la pàgina