1979, núm 1
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/498
2018-12-16T11:15:44ZAcknowledgements
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/604
Acknowledgements
2005-11-08T17:23:03ZNotes to Contributors
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/603
Notes to Contributors
2005-11-08T17:22:51ZMembers of the research group
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/602
Members of the research group
2005-11-08T17:22:39ZInstitutionals Contacts
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/601
Institutionals Contacts
2005-11-08T17:22:16ZSpecial Session on Rigidity in Syracuse
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/530
Special Session on Rigidity in Syracuse
American Mathematical Society
2005-11-04T12:41:19ZAmerican Mathematical SocietyPoly-Kit
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/529
Poly-Kit
Baracs, Janos
2005-11-04T12:23:53ZBaracs, JanosJuxtapositions
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/528
Juxtapositions
Baracs, Janos
The paper begins with a short historical review of juxtapositions and some arguments which link morphological design in architecture to spacefillings. Three new methods for generating juxtapositions are then described in some detail: the “cube splittings”, the “compound arrangements”, and the “concave parallelohedra”.
2005-11-04T12:23:28ZBaracs, JanosThe paper begins with a short historical review of juxtapositions and some arguments which link morphological design in architecture to spacefillings. Three new methods for generating juxtapositions are then described in some detail: the “cube splittings”, the “compound arrangements”, and the “concave parallelohedra”.Realizability of Polyhedra
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/527
Realizability of Polyhedra
Whiteley, Walter
We address ourselves to three types of combinatorial and projective problems, all of which
concern the patterns of faces, edges and vertices of polyhedra. These patterns, as combinatorial structures, we call combinatorial oriented polyhedra. Which patterns can be realized in space with plane faces, bent along every edge, and how can these patterns be generated topologlcally? Which polyhedra are constructed in space by a series of single or double truncations on the smallest polyhedron of the type (for example from the tetrahedron for spherical polyhedra)? Which plane line drawings portraying the edge graph of a combinatorial polyhedron are actually the projection of the edges of a plane-faced polyhedron in space? Wherever possible known results and specific conjectures are given.
2005-11-04T12:23:00ZWhiteley, WalterWe address ourselves to three types of combinatorial and projective problems, all of which
concern the patterns of faces, edges and vertices of polyhedra. These patterns, as combinatorial structures, we call combinatorial oriented polyhedra. Which patterns can be realized in space with plane faces, bent along every edge, and how can these patterns be generated topologlcally? Which polyhedra are constructed in space by a series of single or double truncations on the smallest polyhedron of the type (for example from the tetrahedron for spherical polyhedra)? Which plane line drawings portraying the edge graph of a combinatorial polyhedron are actually the projection of the edges of a plane-faced polyhedron in space? Wherever possible known results and specific conjectures are given.Résumés en français de ces articles
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/526
Résumés en français de ces articles
2005-11-04T12:22:23ZStructural Rigidity
http://hdl.handle.net/2099/521
Structural Rigidity
Crapo, Henry
This article summarizes the presently available general theory of rigidity of 3-dimensional structures. We explain how a structure, for instance a bar and joint structure, can fail to be rigid for two quite different types of reasons. First, it may not have enough bars connecting certain sets of nodes. That is, it may faij for topologlcrl reasons. Secondly, although it may “count” correctly, it may still fail to be rigid if it is set up with some special relative positions of its nodes and bars; This second type of failure is a question not of topology but of projectbe geometry.
2005-11-03T19:37:37ZCrapo, HenryThis article summarizes the presently available general theory of rigidity of 3-dimensional structures. We explain how a structure, for instance a bar and joint structure, can fail to be rigid for two quite different types of reasons. First, it may not have enough bars connecting certain sets of nodes. That is, it may faij for topologlcrl reasons. Secondly, although it may “count” correctly, it may still fail to be rigid if it is set up with some special relative positions of its nodes and bars; This second type of failure is a question not of topology but of projectbe geometry.