Variations of the Gauss Seidel and the gauss implicit z-bus load flow methods for primary-secondary integrated distribution grids

dc.contributor.authorBarrenechea Gruber, Roberto Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Vicuña Muñoz de la Nava, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorCastilla Fernández, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorRypin, Federico
dc.contributor.authorPaiva Mata, Pedro
dc.contributor.groupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. SEPIC - Sistemes Electrònics de Potència i de Control
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-08T09:20:23Z
dc.date.available2024-09-01T00:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.description.abstractThe primary and secondary distribution grids are typically designed separately and operated with a radial configuration; therefore, specialized load flow methods only applicable to radial or weakly meshed networks are normally used. However, projections indicate that the distribution grids will be more interconnected in the future, mainly because of the inclusion of distributed generation, voltage and reliability optimization, as well as an efficiency improvement when the primary and secondary networks are considered in an integrated way. For this new meshed grids scenario, the efficient and precise typically used load flow methods for distribution networks are no longer applicable and it becomes necessary using load flow algorithms that are also applicable for meshed configurations, such as the ones classically used for transmission networks like the Newton-Raphson, Gauss-Seidel and Gauss Implicit Z-bus methods, while also procuring to avoid potential singularity problems which may arise when dealing with long radial grids. In this work, variations of the Gauss-Seidel and Gauss Implicit Z-bus methods are presented, that are adequate for low and medium voltage grids regardless of the network configuration. Additionally, a linear, direct, and non-iterative load flow variation is presented as well as a comparison between different possible convergence criteria for the classical methods.
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.identifier.citationBarrenechea, R. [et al.]. Variations of the Gauss Seidel and the gauss implicit z-bus load flow methods for primary-secondary integrated distribution grids. "Electric power systems research", Setembre 2022, vol. 210, núm. article 108061.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108061
dc.identifier.issn0378-7796
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2117/403971
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378779622002863
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.rights.licensenameAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria elèctrica::Distribució d’energia elèctrica::Xarxes elèctriques
dc.subject.lcshElectric power systems
dc.subject.lemacSistemes de distribució d'energia elèctrica
dc.subject.otherDistribution
dc.subject.otherGauss-Seidel
dc.subject.otherIll-conditioned
dc.subject.otherLinearized
dc.subject.otherLoad flow
dc.subject.otherZ-bus
dc.titleVariations of the Gauss Seidel and the gauss implicit z-bus load flow methods for primary-secondary integrated distribution grids
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.citation.authorBarrenechea, R.; Garcia de Vicuña, J.; Castilla, M.; Rypin, F.; Paiva, P.
local.citation.numberarticle 108061
local.citation.publicationNameElectric power systems research
local.citation.volume210
local.identifier.drac38427616

Fitxers