Chemical characterization of odorous emissions: A comparative performance study of different sampling methods

dc.contributor.authorPolvara, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorGallego Piñol, Eva
dc.contributor.authorInvernizzi, Mario
dc.contributor.authorPerales Lorente, José Francisco
dc.contributor.authorSironi, Selena
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Química
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T13:52:55Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T13:52:55Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.description.abstractA comparison among different sampling methods (3 types of sorbent tubes and polymeric bags) commonly adopted in chemical analyses of odorous emissions was performed. To investigate the different performances, a lignocellulosic biomass storage plant was selected to obtain preliminary information about the chemical nature of odorous emissions. Samples of odorous emissions were collected at different biomass piles and analysed by dynamic olfactometry and TD-GC-MS. By comparing the two adopted sampling methods (tubes and bags), different performances are shown, depending on their specificity. By the comparison among the three types of sorbent tubes (Multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X and Carboxen 569), Tenax and Sulphur), Sulphur and Multi-sorbent bed present similar performance, while Tenax TA tubes show a different trend in terms of type and numerosity of detected compounds. In addition, from the comparison between tubes and polymeric bags, the number and types of compounds detected in bags are more comparable to those observed in the Multi-sorbent bed and Sulphur tubes. However, a difference between the two methods appears, especially in the detection of low-molecular weight organic compounds. In this study, it is possible to highlight that, due to the complexity of odorous emissions, the selection of the sampling material may affect the obtained chemical results. The detection of different classes of compounds, is a crucial point, to obtaining the most complete characterization of mixtures and comparing the chemical profile with olfactometric results: care must be taken in the choice of sampling material and procedure.
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.versionPostprint (author's final draft)
dc.identifier.citationPolvara, E. [et al.]. Chemical characterization of odorous emissions: A comparative performance study of different sampling methods. "Talanta", Febrer 2023, vol. 253, núm. 124110.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124110
dc.identifier.issn0039-9140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2117/377182
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914022009067
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.rights.licensenameAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria química::Química orgànica::Compostos orgànics
dc.subject.lcshVolatile organic compounds
dc.subject.lemacCompostos orgànics volàtils
dc.subject.otherVolatile organic compounds
dc.subject.otherOdour
dc.subject.otherNalophan™ bags
dc.subject.otherSorbent tubes
dc.subject.otherBiomass storage plant
dc.titleChemical characterization of odorous emissions: A comparative performance study of different sampling methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.citation.authorPolvara, E.; Gallego, E.; Invernizzi, M.; Perales, J.; Sironi, S.
local.citation.number124110
local.citation.publicationNameTalanta
local.citation.volume253
local.identifier.drac34903849

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Article comparativa mostratges biomassa.pdf
Mida:
2.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripció:
Article open access