A stiffness reduction method for the in-plane design of stainless steel members and frames according with EN 1993-1-4
Fitxers
Títol de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Títol del volum
Col·laborador
Editor
Tribunal avaluador
Realitzat a/amb
Tipus de document
Data publicació
Editor
Condicions d'accés
item.page.rightslicense
Publicacions relacionades
Datasets relacionats
Projecte CCD
Abstract
Current design standards for stainless steel such as ASCE 8-02 and EN 1993-1-4 prescribe provisions for the design of cross-sections and members that account for material nonlinearities and strain hardening, although these features are not considered in the global design of structures. Recent studies have highlighted the need of accounting for material nonlinearities in order to design efficient and safe stainless steel structures, and it is expected that the forthcoming versions of the standards will incorporate updated rules for the global design of these structures. To contribute to this field, this paper presents a Stiffness Reduction Method (SRM) for the in-plane design of stainless steel members and frames with stocky sections based on the prescriptions given in the next version of EN 1993-1-4. The proposed approach predicts the ultimate capacity and internal forces in stainless steel structures by performing a second-order elastic analysis in which the stiffnesses of the members are reduced by a set of factors defined in this paper to account for the effect of the spread of plasticity, residual stresses and member imperfections. The accuracy of the presented method is assessed for individual stainless steel structural members (columns, beams, and beam-columns) with different cross-sections and material properties, and for austenitic stainless steel portal frames, against numerical results obtained from nonlinear analyses conducted on finite element models. A comparison between the proposed approach and the Direct Analysis Method prescribed in the upcoming AISC 370 Specification is also provided, showing that the results are comparable in the two approaches.




