Mostra el registre d'ítem simple
Compact finite difference modeling of 2-D acoustic wave propagation
dc.contributor.author | Córdova, Luis |
dc.contributor.author | Rojas, Otilio |
dc.contributor.author | Otero Calviño, Beatriz |
dc.contributor.author | Castillo, Jose |
dc.contributor.other | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Arquitectura de Computadors |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-18T18:23:37Z |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-18T18:23:37Z |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03-15 |
dc.identifier.citation | Córdova, L., Rojas, O., Otero, B., Castillo, J. Compact finite difference modeling of 2-D acoustic wave propagation. "Journal of computational and applied mathematics", 15 Març 2016, vol. 295, p. 83-91. |
dc.identifier.issn | 0377-0427 |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2117/85841 |
dc.description.abstract | We present two fourth-order compact finite difference (CFD) discretizations of the velocity–pressure formulation of the acoustic wave equation in 2-D rectangular grids. The first method uses standard implicit CFD on nodal meshes and requires solving tridiagonal linear systems along each grid line, while the second scheme employs a novel set of mimetic CFD operators for explicit differentiation on staggered grids. Both schemes share a Crank–Nicolson time integration decoupled by the Peaceman–Rachford splitting technique to update discrete fields by alternating the coordinate direction of CFD differentiation (ADI-like iterations). For comparison purposes, we also implement a spatially fourth-order FD scheme using non compact staggered mimetic operators in combination to second-order leap-frog time discretization. We apply these three schemes to model acoustic motion under homogeneous boundary conditions and compare their experimental convergence and execution times, as grid is successively refined. Both CFD schemes show four-order convergence, with a slight superiority of the mimetic version, that leads to more accurate results on fine grids. Conversely, the mimetic leap-frog method only achieves quadratic convergence and shows similar accuracy to CFD results exclusively on coarse grids. We finally observe that computation times of nodal CFD simulations are between four and five times higher than those spent by the mimetic CFD scheme with similar grid size. This significant performance difference is attributed to solving those embedded linear systems inherent to implicit CFD. |
dc.format.extent | 9 p. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ |
dc.subject | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica |
dc.subject.lcsh | Mathematics -- Data processing |
dc.subject.lcsh | Numerical analysis |
dc.subject.other | Schemes |
dc.subject.other | Mimetic finite differences |
dc.subject.other | Acoustic media |
dc.subject.other | ADI methods |
dc.title | Compact finite difference modeling of 2-D acoustic wave propagation |
dc.type | Article |
dc.subject.lemac | Anàlisi numèrica |
dc.subject.lemac | Matemàtica -- Informàtica |
dc.contributor.group | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. CAP - Grup de Computació d'Altes Prestacions |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.037 |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042715000618 |
dc.rights.access | Open Access |
local.identifier.drac | 17691328 |
dc.description.version | Preprint |
dc.relation.projectid | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/644202/EU/Geophysical Exploration using Advanced GAlerkin Methods/GEAGAM |
local.citation.author | Córdova, L.; Rojas, O.; Otero, B.; Castillo, J. |
local.citation.publicationName | Journal of computational and applied mathematics |
local.citation.volume | 295 |
local.citation.startingPage | 83 |
local.citation.endingPage | 91 |
Fitxers d'aquest items
Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents
-
Articles de revista [1.049]
-
Articles de revista [382]