Mostra el registre d'ítem simple

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yang
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-11T11:51:52Z
dc.date.available2016-03-11T11:51:52Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.citationLiu, Yang. Buy-back and revenue-sharing contracts in global supply shain. "Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management", Octubre 2015, vol. 8, núm. 4, p. 447-464.
dc.identifier.issn2013-0953
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2117/84203
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The main propose of this study is to investigate how exchange rate risk affects the buy-back and revenue-sharing contracts in the global supply chain, hence to improve the performance of global supply chain. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a two-echelon global supply chain, with the model equilibrium, this paper studies the difference between the buy-back contract and the revenue-sharing contract. By the transmitting of the exchange rate risk, it discusses the node-enterprises’ optimal strategies. Findings: The result shows that: (1) Both these two contracts can diminish the inefficiency caused by demand risk, but none of them can manage the exchange rate risk. (2) No matter which currency is used to settle the payment, both these two contracts will lead to the transmitting of exchange rate risk from one node-enterprise to another. (3) When the currency of the supplier’s country in the relatively appreciating, it is better to use the buy-back contract; when the currency of the supplier’s country in the relatively depreciating, the revenue-sharing contract will lead to a better result. Research limitations/implications: Though this study analyzes how the exchange rate risk affects these two contracts, it based on the assumption that node-enterprises’ goal is maximizing theirs expected profit. In fact, many firms not only focus on maximizing theirs expected profit; the risk-taking is also an important concern. For future researches, how firms’ risk-preferences affects theirs decisions in the global supply chain will be an interesting question. Also, will there be any difference if consider the node-enterprises’ utility functions instead of the expected profit. Originality/value: Existing literature about the global supply chain mainly focus on the exchange rate risk management, few of them considers the double marginalization effect caused by the demand risk. Therefore, with the exchange rate fluctuation, we discuss the difference between the buy-back contract and the revenue-sharing contract.
dc.format.extent18 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOmniaScience
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Spain
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
dc.subjectÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Economia i organització d'empreses::Direcció d'operacions::Modelització de transports i logística
dc.subject.lcshBusiness logistics
dc.subject.lcshMaterials management
dc.subject.lcshForeign exchange
dc.subject.otherGlobal supply chain
dc.subject.otherExchange rate risk
dc.subject.otherBuy-back contract
dc.subject.otherRevenue-sharing contract
dc.titleBuy-back and revenue-sharing contracts in global supply shain
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.lemacLogística (Indústria)
dc.subject.lemacGestió de compres
dc.subject.lemacCanvi exterior
dc.identifier.dlB-28744-2008
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
local.citation.publicationNameJournal of Industrial Engineering and Management
local.citation.volume8
local.citation.number4
local.citation.startingPage447
local.citation.endingPage464


Fitxers d'aquest items

Thumbnail

Aquest ítem apareix a les col·leccions següents

Mostra el registre d'ítem simple