Comparison of upper airway respiratory resistance measurements with the esophageal pressure/airflow relationship during sleep
Visualitza/Obre
06090872.pdf (1018,Kb) (Accés restringit)
Sol·licita una còpia a l'autor
Què és aquest botó?
Aquest botó permet demanar una còpia d'un document restringit a l'autor. Es mostra quan:
- Disposem del correu electrònic de l'autor
- El document té una mida inferior a 20 Mb
- Es tracta d'un document d'accés restringit per decisió de l'autor o d'un document d'accés restringit per política de l'editorial
Cita com:
hdl:2117/14469
Tipus de documentText en actes de congrés
Data publicació2011
Condicions d'accésAccés restringit per política de l'editorial
Tots els drets reservats. Aquesta obra està protegida pels drets de propietat intel·lectual i
industrial corresponents. Sense perjudici de les exempcions legals existents, queda prohibida la seva
reproducció, distribució, comunicació pública o transformació sense l'autorització del titular dels drets
Abstract
Measurement of upper airway resistance is of
interest in sleep disordered breathing to estimate upper airway patency. Resistance is calculated with the airflow and respiratory effort signals. However, there is no consensus on a standard for upper airway resistance measurement. This study proposes a new benchmarking method to objectively compare different upper airway resistance measurement methods by objectively differentiating between breaths with inspiratory flow limitation (high resistance) and non-limited breaths (low
resistance). Resistance was measured at peak-Pes, at peak-flow, at the linear portion of a polynomial equation, as an area
comparative and as average resistance for an inspiration. A total of 20 patients with systematic, gold-standard esophageal
pressure and nasal airflow acquisition were analyzed and 109,955 breaths were automatically extracted and evaluated.
Relative resistance values in relationship to a reference resistance value obtained during wakefulness were also analyzed. The peak-Pes measurement method obtained the
highest separation index with significant (p < 0.001) differences to the other methods, followed by the area comparative and the
peak-flow methods. As expected, average resistances were significantly (p < 0.001) lower for the non-IFL than for the IFL group. Hence, we recommend employing the peak-Pes for accurate upper airway resistance estimation.
CitacióMorgenstern de Muller, C. [et al.]. Comparison of upper airway respiratory resistance measurements with the esophageal pressure/airflow relationship during sleep. A: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. "Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS". Boston: 2011, p. 3205-3208.
ISBN978-1-4244-4122-8
Col·leccions
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
06090872.pdf | 1018,Kb | Accés restringit |