A comparison of three methods for measure of time to contact
Visualitza/Obre
Estadístiques de LA Referencia / Recolecta
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/6877
Tipus de documentComunicació de congrés
Data publicació2009-10-11
EditorIEEE Press. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Condicions d'accésAccés obert
Tots els drets reservats. Aquesta obra està protegida pels drets de propietat intel·lectual i
industrial corresponents. Sense perjudici de les exempcions legals existents, queda prohibida la seva
reproducció, distribució, comunicació pública o transformació sense l'autorització del titular dels drets
Abstract
Time to Contact (TTC) is a biologically inspired method for obstacle detection and reactive control of motion that does not require scene reconstruction or 3D depth estimation. Estimating TTC is difficult because it requires a stable and reliable estimate of the rate of change of distance
between image features. In this paper we ropose a new method to measure time to contact, Active Contour Affine Scale (ACAS). We experimentally and analytically compare ACAS with two other recently proposed methods: Scale Invariant Ridge Segments (SIRS), and Image Brightness Derivatives
(IBD). Our results show that ACAS provides a more accurate estimation of TTC when the image flow may be approximated by an affine transformation, while SIRS provides an estimate that is generally valid, but may not always be as accurate as ACAS, and IBD systematically over-estimate time to contact.
CitacióAlenyà, G.; Nègre, A.; Crowley, J. A comparison of three methods for measure of time to contact. A: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. "IROS 2009 : 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems". St. Louis, MO: IEEE Press. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2009, p. 4565-4570.
ISBN978-1-4244-3804-4
Versió de l'editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354024
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
guillem.pdf | 1,301Mb | Visualitza/Obre |