Depth-sensing indentation applied to polymers: A comparison between standard methods of analysis in relation to the nature of the materials
Visualitza/Obre
2013 European Polymer Journal.pdf (1,440Mb) (Accés restringit)
Sol·licita una còpia a l'autor
Què és aquest botó?
Aquest botó permet demanar una còpia d'un document restringit a l'autor. Es mostra quan:
- Disposem del correu electrònic de l'autor
- El document té una mida inferior a 20 Mb
- Es tracta d'un document d'accés restringit per decisió de l'autor o d'un document d'accés restringit per política de l'editorial
Estadístiques de LA Referencia / Recolecta
Inclou dades d'ús des de 2022
Cita com:
hdl:2117/21025
Tipus de documentArticle
Data publicació2013
Condicions d'accésAccés restringit per política de l'editorial
Llevat que s'hi indiqui el contrari, els
continguts d'aquesta obra estan subjectes a la llicència de Creative Commons
:
Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 3.0 Espanya
Abstract
Mechanical data (hardness and elastic modulus) from instrumented indentation testing are
often extracted assuming linear elasticity in the initial portion of the unloading. The
method is nowadays widely accepted as a convenient tool to interpret depth-sensing data,
however it is a matter of controversy when applied to polymer materials due to their time-
dependent behavior. More recently, Loubet and co-workers applied continuous stiffness
measurements (CSM), consisting of superimposing a small oscillation to the quasi-static
component of loading, to the study of the mechanical properties of polymers and proposed
a new model to account for the apparent increase in the contact area detected at the first
stages of contact. The present work offers a comparative study between the Loubet’s model
using CSM and the procedure yielding a single reading from the onset of unloading. A wide
range of thermoplastic polymer materials including glassy and semicrystalline polymers
have been investigated. The most important equations employed for each method are sum-
marized and the advantages and disadvantages of employing one procedure or the other
are discussed. The differences found between the results obtained from both approaches
are discussed in relation to the nature of the polymer material. A comparison between
mechanical data extracted from indentation measurements and from classical dynamic
mechanical analysis is offered.
CitacióGiró-Paloma, J. [et al.]. Depth-sensing indentation applied to polymers: A comparison between standard methods of analysis in relation to the nature of the materials. "European polymer journal", 2013, vol. 49, p. 4047-4053.
ISSN0014-3057
Fitxers | Descripció | Mida | Format | Visualitza |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 European Polymer Journal.pdf | 1,440Mb | Accés restringit |