<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2117/1063</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T04:34:23Z</dc:date>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:email>webmaster.bupc@upc.edu</itunes:email>
      <itunes:name>Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Servei de Biblioteques i Documentació</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords />
    <item>
      <title>Participatory processes and institutional debate activities as key complementary aspects for embedding sustainability in higher education</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2117/2263</link>
      <description>Title: Participatory processes and institutional debate activities as key complementary aspects for embedding sustainability in higher education
Authors: Esteban, F.; Ferrer Balas, Dídac; Barceló García, Miquel
Abstract: Introducing sustainable development into educational programs of universities tend to be&#xD;
approached under two complementary strategies: “top-down” and “bottom-up”. Top-down&#xD;
strategies promote the adaptation of the institutional framework to the new challenges that&#xD;
sustainable development generates into technical expertise areas. Bottom-up strategies focus&#xD;
on institutional activities oriented to convincing or supporting lecturers in integrating sustainable&#xD;
development in their different courses and projects. However, these actions are not enough for&#xD;
the actual challenge if sustainable development is seen as a transformative social learning&#xD;
process in which the role of academia regarding sustainable development “is not on integration&#xD;
but rather one of innovation and systemic change within our institutions that will allow for more&#xD;
transformative learning to take place”. Thus, there are other strategies “in-between” that&#xD;
complement these to approaches, because they help to accelerate the institutional culture shift&#xD;
and therefore facilitate the concrete changes needed. The aim of this paper is to describe the&#xD;
UPC experience on the development of two complementary aspects developed under its UPC&#xD;
Sustainable 2015 institutional strategy: participatory processes and institutional debate&#xD;
activities.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2117/2263</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-10-02T14:43:56Z</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Esteban, F.; Ferrer Balas, Dídac; Barceló García, Miquel</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>sustainability, particiatory, higher education, organization</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>Introducing sustainable development into educational programs of universities tend to be&#xD;
approached under two complementary strategies: “top-down” and “bottom-up”. Top-down&#xD;
strategies promote the adaptation of the institutional framework to the new challenges that&#xD;
sustainable development generates into technical expertise areas. Bottom-up strategies focus&#xD;
on institutional activities oriented to convincing or supporting lecturers in integrating sustainable&#xD;
development in their different courses and projects. However, these actions are not enough for&#xD;
the actual challenge if sustainable development is seen as a transformative social learning&#xD;
process in which the role of academia regarding sustainable development “is not on integration&#xD;
but rather one of innovation and systemic change within our institutions that will allow for more&#xD;
transformative learning to take place”. Thus, there are other strategies “in-between” that&#xD;
complement these to approaches, because they help to accelerate the institutional culture shift&#xD;
and therefore facilitate the concrete changes needed. The aim of this paper is to describe the&#xD;
UPC experience on the development of two complementary aspects developed under its UPC&#xD;
Sustainable 2015 institutional strategy: participatory processes and institutional debate&#xD;
activities.</itunes:summary>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

